patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Save YOUR Mahwah DPW

Hello All,     We would like everyone to know, that on Friday, our Mayor, will be making a selection on which company he would like to bring in, to take over the recylcing for the township. What that means to you, is...   7 DPW staff being let go. That is 1 less leaf crew, out of 3 .       That is 4 sections of town, not being plowed. That is 7 Firemen and of those 7, 3 are ambulance drivers... SERVICES WILL SUFFER !!!!  THIS IS BEING DONE WITHOUT THE PUBLIC BEING MADE AWARE !!!!  PLEASE, come to the council meeting on Thursday, July 12th. to find out the facts.   There are other ways to save money, in a town, that the Mayor has called "Stable".

NJ Boomer

8:29 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Call the Mayor to voice your dissent. Is this part of the "We want to shrink government until it fits in a bathtub" campaign? DPW provides most of the important services that make a society liveable - trash, snow plowing, leave pickup, recycling. I for one intend to contact the Mayor's office, or stop in at his gas station, to voice my concern for this proposal and my dissent. I encourage all who value the quality of life we enjoy in Mahwah to join me in this effort.

Reply

Jimmy John

11:03 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

I have to give credit to mayor Laforet............he has successfully failed as Mayor of Mahwah

Reply

Mark

10:51 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Mahwah works! Why would the Mayor and Council change something that we know works? I hope the residents turn out on Thursday (7/12/12) @ 8 Pm to voice their concerns. Don't fix something that isn't broken.

Reply

Ira

11:06 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

From what I understand hiring outside private contractors is cheaper than full time crew with sick days, paid holidays and vacation, health care, pension.
If we want our taxes to stay at current level it seems to be a logical move.
I have nothing against people working for DPW but there is a cheaper alternative.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank

12:41 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

our taxes are at the current level anyway

Comment_arrow

Mark

7:42 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Ira,

What happens when the vendors start pushing their prices up? What happens to your savings? And think about what you said ... they can do it cheaper because they don't pay for holidays, vacation, Health care and Pensions. What kind of workforce are you getting that has no benefits? Basically, they are the equivalent to day laborers. They come and go and have no investment in your town. Does that sound like the American dream? or are we selling out the middle class to save pennies that the politicians will squander anyway.

Regenbogen

1:22 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Ed Sinclair...Mahwah needs you!!

Reply

SaveMahwahDPW

2:15 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

@Ira.... You are correct. However, if the mayor wants to save, then save across the board. Rough figures show, that removing the recycling dept. would roughly save, 200 - 300 k......Great numbers IF NEEDED..... During our previous mayors stint in office, an order came down from the state, saying that Police overtime in court, FOR FIRST APPEARANCES, was no longer needed, in an attempt to save the towns money. "FIRST APPEARANCES ONLY" This saved our town almost 200 - 300 k in overtime costs. This was eliminated. OUR TOWN WAS SAVING MONEY. HOWEVER, the new mayor gets in, and the head of the police dept is now calling the shots,and GUESS WHAT....THE POLICE OVERTIME IS GIVEN BACK !!!! NOT ONE TOWN AROUND US DOES THIS. Mahwah does.......So Ira, ....i ask you......why pay 300k in OVERTIME costs to guys making 125k. That the state says is not needed,and ELIMINATE 7 employees that make around 50k ??? Is there any FAIRNESS in that ???? Is it worth you having your services cut back to cover overtime costs ??? The DPW employees are daytime firemen and ambulance personal. There are MANY other ways to save money in this township. The mayor is trying to sneak this past the public next Thursday. Nice guy. By the way, here are a few exact numbers for you. Police payroll w/out overtime 8.1 M. DPW Payroll 2.7 M But the DPW is where you want to cut ??? The Police do a great job, and there are great people there, but if you can cut overtime, to save jobs.... Its a no brainer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mahwah Resident

11:47 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

SaveMahwahDPW, Can you get a one-call-now out to the Mahwah residents about the meeting. Alot of people who do not go on the patch do NOT know about what is going on. This is terrible and we as Mahwah residents need to try and stop this. Shame on this mayor.

Jimmy John

3:03 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

@ Ira...whether the dpw workers stay or they contract the work out my understanding is there will be not a dime difference in your taxes. Point being sounds like Laforet is attacking the hard working dpw workers because of his personal agenda and nothing more

Reply

Crazylady

4:21 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

You are correct Jimmy John. I bet, if we get rid of the DPW personal, we won't even notice it in our taxes. I voted for this Mayor before. My husband and I will not vote for him this year. Thank god it was only for a 1 year term. We are tired of him attacking our volunteers, taking credit for things he doesn't derserve and now trying to lay off our township employees. I know alot of them, and am aware that most of them grew up in our township. This is no way to run a town. Hopefully things change in November.

Reply

ref

6:27 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

DPW to suffer because the king has some stiff competition that knows more about this town and how its run than the present person who thinks he is GOD,thats not the way its done mayor laforet.

Reply

Regenbogen

9:13 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Let's save some money by not lighting the ballfield on East Ramapo Ave when it's daylight and not in use. There are some major lights on that field.

Reply

Jimmy John

9:59 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

My only comcern is Laforet already sent the contract out to bid....his mind is already made unless there is a public out cry

Reply

Suzy

10:09 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Can't we leave well enough alone? Let's keep the small town feel of Mahwah, by having our neighbors be the ones that work in Mahwah. Do you really think people that work for another company are going to care what kind of job they do? No - it's when it's your town that you are 'in charge of' that you take pride. If anything, it would be nice to have the sanitation workers be from Mahwah again!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

10:01 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Bravo, Suzy! Well said!

Jimmy John

10:14 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Thats what I dont understand you have mahwah people working in mahwah......why would you want some company from paterson in mahwah...who knows what could go on

Reply

ref

6:11 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

It is my understanding that the "mayor" cannot award any type of contracts without the approval of the council. Come on ED Sinclair we need you to save our town from this type of nonsense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:49 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Don't get it - if the council is deciding this - then why would you need Ed Sinclair. He's not running for council?

(I don't mind at all that you like Mr. Sinclair - so maybe you should post your support in the article that talks about him running for mayor?)

Comment_arrow

Hank

2:07 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

The mayor wanted to disband the Ambulance Corps.
He was unable to do it.
1.Three ambulance drivers are in recycling div of DPW
2.Political rival Ed Sinclair is a DPW supervisor
Mayor proposed to disband and layoff recycling dept.
Is this really a financial move or is it political revenge?

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:44 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

Hank - please show where the Mayor wanted to "disband the ambulance corps". You are completely pulling this out of your hat.

The FACT is that he had proposed to have a private company fill in whenever NO volunteer EMTs OR drivers where available after the dispatcher tried twice to get an ambulance to a scene. The ambulance corps would continue to answer the exact same calls that they have always been able to answer.

You are entitled to like or dislike any mayoral candidate - but if you feel you have to lie to "prop up" your favorite candidate, then it tells volumes about how qualified you feel that person is.

William Ackerson

1:53 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

I'm sorry I missed the cutoff for filing to run . This town cant afford to get screwed up too much more .

Reply

Malcolm from Mahwah

4:30 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

If the mayor really wants to make an impact on the budget, he should be concentrating his efforts on the biggest expenses. Every township service is run on a mere 23.4% of our tax bills. The School system takes 60.7% nearly 3 times as much. A better strategy for cost cutting would be to concentrate on the schools exclusively, or at least make cuts across the board and at comparable rates. For every dollar of cuts to town services three should be made to the schools.

Reply
Comment_arrow

K-od

9:01 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Kod
Starting cutting school taxes . Maybe you can afford to live here.

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:40 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

Neither the mayor, not even the President, controls the school budget.
For THAT you elected the school board (unless you chose not to attend school board elections). They control the 60% of your property tax.

The Mayor can only "concentrate his efforts" on the expense HE (the township) can effect - which is the amount on your tax bill that's left after School and County taxes.

You are barking up the wrong tree.

Jonathan N. Marcus, Esq.

8:16 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

The School Board is the body that is responsible for the local school taxes. The mayor has no control over that process.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Malcolm from Mahwah

8:40 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

The Board is responsible for their own budget, not taxes. Collection and distribution of funds is a township function. If the Board fails to adjust their budget as requested cut them a smaller check, and do it for them.

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:36 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

Malcolm,

the township only controls a small portion of your property tax bill, which is three DIFFERENT amounts (school, county and township).

The school board IS the one deciding your school taxes, which is the biggest portion of your property tax bill. They decide on a budget, then this total figure (I'm simplifying) is devided by the total property value in town and the amount that shows up on YOUR tax bill is proportional figure based on your home's property value.

The township is not involved in the amount of school taxes you pay.

(The ONLY exception is if the school board were to ever exceed the 2% increase cap. IF a budget is then voted down by the residents, THEN the council can make proposals on how the school budget might be reduced.)

The township has its OWN budget and it's OWN budget cap that it has to stay within. Many costs are mandated by the state, by law, by existing contracts, pension obligations, health care obligations etc - whatever amount is left has to pay for running the town. If there's not enough left, then costs/services must be cut.

This is true in particular, when people freak out because they are asked to forego one Starbucks visit a month, or maybe skip the movies once - to pay for the increasing costs of running the town.

ref

11:10 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

Maybe you should find out the real facts Mr. Schmidt unless you believe everything your told

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

11:53 am on Friday, July 6, 2012

And how did "ref" obtain his/her version of the "facts" -- or did YOU just believe what you were told?
(Besides, I don't even know what specific "fact" you are referring to? The fact that the council makes that decision, not the mayor? The fact that the school board controls your school taxes, not the mayor?)

The mayor CAN attend council meetings but does NOT even have the power to VOTE:
http://clerkshq.com/default.ashx?clientsite=Mahwah-nj

Billy

6:27 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

@ Andy the mayor wanted to disban the ambulance because mister blank of mpd thought it would bring money to the town, from his vast experience with oem in Paramus now look back last year the ambulance corps gave back 200k for there budget to help the town out and was also told to look at a program to bill the people for there services. All at mister blanks suggestion and trying to run the town, and so you know this isn't being pulled out of anyone's hat just ask any ambulance member and they will tell you the same stuff

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

6:36 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012

Billy, yes, I'm familiar with "spin" that one of the two corps was putting on it. The reality, as the township administrator stated in March about the proposals being considered "both volunteer squads will remain in existence" - as reported here:
http://mahwah.patch.com/articles/members-fight-for-ambulance-corps-undecided-future
They chose to spend donations on lawyers, ads and other public relations. At the end, they still had to sit down at the table and work out the coverage problem. The police is handling dispatch, consequently they were the ones who kept detailed logs of the trouble they sometimes went through (and how much precious time passed) as they were trying to get SOMEONE, ANYONE to answer a call!

The volunteers do the best they can - but there CAN be times when people simply can not be reached.

SaveMahwahDPW

6:54 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Mr. Schmidt, you obviously like to state facts by posting links on patch. Please be aware that you are only posting, and quoting the END RESULT. What you don't include about the ambulance , is the Mayor tried to break them apart. The mayor, just like recycling saw dollar signs. He always states that he's a business man. The town obviously doesn't want a business man to turn a profit, they want a leader who will keep services where they are, and keep taxes level. The main issue at the heart of the ambulance, was CHARGING RESIDENTS FOR SOMETHING THAT IS FREE NOW....the mayor then ( being sneaky as normal ) tried to say that only third part billing would be used.. he tried to tell little old ladies that it would be ok to "not to pay the bill ...it would simply go away. The ambulance fought back....and he caved as well.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

7:32 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Please do your homework. Make a public records request for the dispatch records of te past 2 years. The problem was NOT with the VERY many calls that the great volunteers of Corp 1 were able to respond to timely!

But, it IS the mayors duty (one of the few actually explicity stated in the town's "bylaws") to organize timely and adequate emergency response by organizing and overseeing the various emergency services!

The one thing a repsonsible mayor will do (and should have been done by the prior mayors), is to look at THOSE few times when our volunteers were overtasked.

The solution could NO LONGER be to "leave good enough" alone (like prior mayors did), while patients are waiting IMpatiently for an ambulance to arrive for half an hour.

Alternatives were for the ambulance corps to either come up with solutions on how to address response times during those worst-case scenarios - or for the town to provide a backup-up solutions (if necessary through a paid service).

I don't care about your turf wars. election politics and legal wrangles!
But if ever a member of my family shoudl need an ambulance at a time when either the driver or the EMT are at their own place of work or are otherwise unable to repond to police dispatch, then I demand of the mayor to have put procedures in place (if necessary through a paid service) that will get someone to my house quickly.

Get it?

Comment_arrow

T-Bird 148

8:27 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

I really wish you would stop using the ambulance issue simply because it is convenient support for your argument - your talking apples and oranges. I am not a supporter of the mayor and I definitely not for the privatization of our Recycling, but the ambulance issue coming to a head was not Laforet's fault. Martel and DaPuzzo both had this issue on their radar screen. The first aid squads have a core of good people, but their leadership at times has been lacking and the citizens suffer. How would you feel if your 3 year old was experiencing a seizure and you had to wait 45 minutes for an ambulance on a Sunday morning??? Incidents like that were becoming the norm, not the exception. Ask Lisa DiGuilio and Sam Alderisio if they weren't advised repeatedly by police officers, NOT the Chief, of the problem with getting ambulances on the road! That is a FACT!

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:16 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Agreed - it let's the real motivation show through. Instead of positive voice (of support) FOR something (the DPW workers), they apparently are just looking for a way to get the mayorial campaign going early.

Comment_arrow

Hank

10:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

simple lay off 3 ambulance drivers now the corps is "overtasked" for lack of drivers and the mayor gets his way

SaveMahwahDPW

7:05 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Please also be aware....THE MAYOR RAN ON TRANSPARENCY ....if the mayor is so transparent, then why is the DPW telling the residents about the possibility of outsourcing, something as important as recycling... SHOULDN'T THE MAN YOU ELECTED AS YOUR MAYOR ASK FOR THE PEOPLES INPUT ??? There is the possibility of 7 town employees being fired.....do you think mayor has told any of his employees ???? The DPW part of your tax bill is tiny...when he gets rid of recycling it equates to less than one "tax point" of savings....THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE IN YOUR BILL......so I ask you,...WHY...and the reason is simple.... He is not the one calling the shots....there is a man who sits in a corner office in town and despises the DPW and volunteers.....When the mayor took office, he wasn't even aware of how many ambulance squads we had in town....he couldn't put a budget together...I.e the blue ribbon panel...and he sure as heck doesn't know the long term disaster the town will have by letting an already skeleton crew at the DPW lose more men. ..The mayor has not sat on the council one day...he is lost....in his short term he has tried to change things that never should have been changed...you want to save money...go line item by line item....

Reply

Mark

12:15 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012

Running a business is about profit. Running a Government is about providing services. If you cut local staff, you will cut services. There is no such thing as getting more for less. You get less for less. Think about candy bars. They charged the same, but the contents inside the wrapper was more cardboard than candy. Now, you can buy the same size candy but it costs more. They call it the "super size". Its a trick to keep you buying into their Bull*#@!,

Reply

Harriett

11:34 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012

Why not sell or rent out the empty house across from Winters pond (which the township owns).

Reply

Andy Schmidt

5:08 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

@SaveYourDPW
"7 DPW staff being let go...That is 7 Firemen"

Since you are on the inside and have access to the exact employee count and even their volunteering - you obviously know each of these persons and can help us understand the gravity of the situation.

How many of these 7 employees will be reaching retirement within the year? Obviously, those persons would be "lost" to the DPW anyway, regardless of any privatizing - and their decision to volunteer upon retirement would still be the same.

Reply

SaveMahwahDPW

5:17 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

@ ANDY....we all know that you are a supporter of Laforet.....We have seen your name in his ads.....So we know whos team your on....and thats fine..... We will not debate you on here.....Come Thursday. But i will say....the people being laid off...NOT ONE IS NEAR RETIREMENT AGE....You dont know how layoffs work in town.....CALL BILL....HE DOES HIS HOMEWORK !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

5:30 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012

I'm glad that you can confirm that no one is laid off who is nearing retirement. That wasn't the question though.

The question was, how many of the 7 employees that you keep referring to, will reach retirement within the year (and thus won't be among the ones laid off).

As far as NOT wanting to debate... that's a bit dishonest, after creating a new blog entry, an announcement entry - and your various messages left where you ARE debating this matter?

Jimmy John

10:21 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

I believe the 7 are the last 7 hired so none are close to retirement

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

10:43 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Well in two days all that "believing", false rumors and supposition will be replaced by the knowledge of the ACTUAL proposal. After that, an objective discussions of the pros and cons can start - and I can respect people voicing their various opinions at that time.

Right now, this clearly can not be about the proposed changes, because the pundits haven't seen it yet. So under the disguise of supporting the DPW, people are just desperate for an opportunity to lauch anonymous personal attacks, hoping to get an early start on someone's mayoral campain.

Comment_arrow

Hank

9:03 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Andy why didn't you use that argument when "stop the mall" first started?

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:57 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Hank - can't speak for that group, don't know them (although I recognize some of the names in the paper). However, THEIR opposition was NOT against a "supposed" proposal - but against the ACTUAL proposal to rezone the Crossroads property to suit the developer. (As you know yourself, the property was INDEED rezoned, the referendum did INDEED show a lack of majority support, etc.)

I have NOTHING BAD to say about the DPW and only had POSITIVE contact with their staff.

But, here the GOOD cause of keeping services local is being politically exploited to plainly support one candidate's mayoral campaign, by turning this into a week-long rumor spreading exercise about details contained of a propsoal no one has seen and that won't be known until tomorrow night (e.g., HOW many are effected in which manner, e.g. retirement, reassignment vs. lay-off).

Intertwining what should/would have been a worthwhile cause, with a plain attempt to rewrite history about the Ambulance Corps, the Crossroads, personal attacks against one of the candidates... (you name it) -- is just too disingenuous for reasonable people to get behind.

I can be in support for an issue - but keep the election politics out of it. THEN I turn away.

Jimmy John

10:24 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

And the 7 doesnt count the ones who will retire and those spots prob wont be filled either thanks to mr cant run a town

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

10:47 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Okay, so some WILL retire - which means there will be opportunity to retain some personnel to replace the upcoming retirements. Which is different from firing someone.

>> the last 7 hired <<

How recent were the last few hires? Since this has been pondered by the administrator for many months...

LuvsMahwah

11:35 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012

It's common practice to low-ball a bid to win a contract. Once you're in, you just keep raising your prices. I think that 200-300k savings would shrink to nothing in short order. Meanwhile, when the next hurricane hits, or when the snow starts piling up because the DPW no longer has the manpower or ability to call in the reserves, how important do you think that estimated savings of $2 per month, per taxpaying household is going to be? I don't know about you, but if I had to pay someone to pick up and haul away all the brush at my house after Irene, it likely would have cost me a thousand dollars or more.

Reply

Andy Schmidt

8:39 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012

The mayor just announced this morning that as part of his proposal...

"...just ONE employee MAY lose their job, while others will assume duties in other departments in the Township."

Also, Council President John Spiech said “This had been in the air, back as far as Mayor Martel”.

So - now that the FACTS about the ACTUAL proposal are out, will anyone be man/woman enough to retract their false claims?

Reply

LuvsMahwah

6:30 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

The mayor caved to a public outcry that he was not expecting. Exactly what an elected official should do (in most cases). Good for him. Now, my curiosity is truly piqued as to how he plans to privatize recycling AND retain 6 out of 7 DPW employees and still save us money. Stay tuned.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank

6:34 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

that is a very good question.

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

7:12 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

No caving - because the scary scenario that people were hyping so that they could have a few days of faking personal attacks - is not what's being proposed.

The administration has been working on this since last year - and thus has had time to come up with a workable plan. There will be retirements - and the plan is not to replace those - so the savings are in NOT having to hire replacement staff.

Secondly, there are open positions in other departments. Instead of hiring NEW staff, the existing DPW employees can be retrained. The cost savings come from NOT having to hire additional staff.

Also, because this has been discussed for years (two mayors ago), when people were hired most recently it was already clear that these positions may not be available permanent.

As a net effect, our "government" will be smaller - which apparently is so important to many people, until it happens in your own back-yard.

Heath

8:32 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Put it in perspective with what we pay annually to retirees:

Mahwah’s $100,000 Club – Retired Public Employees

http://newjersey.watchdog.org/2012/04/03/100k-sidebar/

Name Pension/Yr Employer at Retirement
MONTESANO, CHARLES V $131,190 MAHWAH BD OF ED
KOYAK, WILLIAM $115,077 MAHWAH TOWNSHIP
VANECK, ALLAN $108,206 MAHWAH BD OF ED
OKEEFE, DENNIS J $103,931 MAHWAH TOWNSHIP
HANRATTY, PATRICIA A $101,970 MAHWAH BD OF ED
ALDERISIO, SAMU $100,056 MAHWAH TOWNSHIP

Reply

Andy Schmidt

9:26 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012

Have they contributed to their pension plans through salary deductions?

Reply

joseph j guider

7:20 am on Sunday, July 22, 2012

WOW!!! and all those named above did their time when Mahwah twp. was considered a sleepy bedroom community in North Jersey. I wonder what the property tax scenario would be like, if there had been responsible and just financial administrtion. Does the Blue Ribbon Panel have any suggestions for reforming the retirement structure for this Mahwah Metropolis.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

12:03 pm on Sunday, July 22, 2012

Half of those names are school employees - nothing the "blue ribbon panel" has any input on.

Also, what role does state law play in pension/health obligations for municipalities? Does the township actually CHOOSE?

hsr

12:25 pm on Sunday, July 22, 2012

I'm so glad we get another chance to vote for a mayor in November. Hopefully
we have a choice that's good. Not one that will take away our services. They are
important to the every day working person. I don't want less street clean up or
to get rid of my own leaves or pay to have them picked up by a landscaper, I have
to get to work early even in bad weather as a nurse. I don't want this town to become like some of the others around here.

Reply

Leave a comment