County Executive's Son Arrested On Drug Charges
Brendan Donovan charged with possession of marijuana, allegedly smoked pot with teen girls in his mother's house.
The son of Bergen County Executive Kathleen Donovan was arrested Wednesday after smoking marijuana with two teenage Rutherford High School students at Donovan's home, police said.
Brendan Donovan, 20, was charged with possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and being under the influence of marijuana, Rutherford Police Capt. Hal Ciser said.
Police received a call Wednesday from Rutherford High School at 1:23 p.m. informing them that a female student had left school and appeared to be under the influence of drugs, Ciser said.
Police were unable to locate her, but received another call 20 minutes later saying that the student returned to school with another female student, Ciser said.
The 17-year-old and the 16-year-old girls both appeared to be under the influence, Ciser said. They were transported to Hackensack University Medical Center.
Police learned that they smoked marijuana with Brendan Donovan at his Rutherford residence, where he lives with his mother, Ciser said. Police went to the home to make sure he didn't need treatment as well.
There, police learned that the girls took Xanax in addition to smoking marijuana, Ciser said. But Donovan "had nothing to do with the pills," Ciser said.
After smoking with them, Donovan dropped the girls off at the high school, Ciser said.
Donovan was processed and released after his arrest.
Jeanne Baratta, Kathleen Donovan's chief of staff, issued a statement in response to the arrest.
"This is a very difficult time for the County Executive and her family, and obviously a very personal matter," Baratta wrote. "Ms. Donovan appreciates people respecting her privacy and the privacy of her son.”
john doe
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
What was he charged with sounds like distribution to me
Andy Schmidt
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
>> After smoking with them, Donovan dropped the girls off at the high school <<
To me, that's the scary part - it's not just what they do to themselves, and to their own families. But then they get behind a wheel while stoned, and risk hurting or even killing someone else's child (e.g., some other highschool student who was unlucky enough to be in the path), or someone's parent.
Miles Wilson Carter
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
I guess all that holier than thou stuff just went under the "privacy bus"!
Carey Grant
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Oh please. Guess you're the one to cast the first stone eh?
Lex Zanzabar
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
He is no more of a criminal than your common drinker. The unjust persecution of Marijuana users in the county is foolish. An overwhelming majority of Americans feel it should be federally decriminalized, if not legalized and regulated. But at the very least, it shouldn't ruin kids futures and records, only because they smoked a joint once, like the rest of use.
Now the girls with Xanax.. Thats a different story. That is actually dangerous, and harmful.
Keith Kaplan
3:36 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Driving after getting high would make this more criminal -- but he doesn't appear (from the article at least) to have been charged with that.
amen
3:36 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
lex- i agree with part of your post, if someone choses to smoke pot that is thier choice. however the fact that he drove (to a high school) while high is the troubling part to me. as well as him being 20 and doing drugs with a 16 year old girl. i know 4 years doesnt seem like a big difference and it wouldnt bother me if he ws 27 and she was 23, but at 16 your still a kid and a 20 year old should know its wrong to be doing drugs w/ a 16 year old when she should be in school
Annoyed
6:12 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
But he wasn't charged with contributing to the deliquency of a minor, after all he's 20 and they are 16 and 17. The entire thing is a farce, if that was mine or your child they would be facing bigger charges besides possession.
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Lex,study up on what Marijuana does to your mind and body.100 times worse than cigarettes. Then you have the girls letting their inhibitions down. Plus what it does to the brain. Read up and then come and tell me it should be decriminalized. I could go on for hours with this one. You want to regulate and tax it? Show me anything the government got involved in that worked. On what should be a money-maker the GOV would lose billions.
Malcolm Kyle
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
We just need to throw a few more trillion dollars at this. Give the police total power and proper weapons - like Death-Rays that work on large crowds. Take away forever what's left of everybody's stupid rights and liberties. Indulge ourselves in even more wishful thinking or bizarre pseudo-science, then, before more hippies or the pathetically ill & dying get a chance to corrupt and endanger our truly pure and caring society with their evil plants, send all our children to Newt's Moon Colony of re-education to be taught about marital fidelity.
ccr
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
I'd like to kmnow the outcome of this arrest or is this going to be one of those cases, where the dirt gets swept under the carpet.
Keith Kaplan
2:35 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Two open homicides in my town alone and we're arresting a 20 year old for smoking a joint at his mom's house. Yup, priorities seem right in line!
How about an arrest for corrupting a minor, driving under the influence or any of the DANGEROUS things that seem to have gone on here? Nope - possession of weed is all he gets?
Harlan Consider
3:36 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
So if I understand your logic, no-one should be arrested for any crime that falls below murder until the two open homicides are solved?
Paul Umrichin
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
I am sorry Ms. Donovan on your thoughts of being a private matter. As soon as you decided to run for public office you placed your privacy on hold.
Carey Grant
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
She wasn't caught smoking pot...it was her son. Why don't you let her tend to her family matters without sticking your nose into it?
john doe
3:36 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
not only smoking pot but driving under the influence of it same as driving under the influence of alcohol, providing it to 2 minors seems like a distribution charge to me as well as contributing to the delinquincy of a minor. it wasn't his first time the girls new where to go.
from the article he only got a possesion charge seems like they went easy on him to me.
Another thing to look at how did the girls get off the school campus during the day? Article says the school only knew one of the two were missing.
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
I don't know about the school rules in Rutherford but in Fair Lawn the kids are allowed to leave the campus.
Chris Antonelli
6:09 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Wow! A 20 year old kid gets caught smoking weed. No, wait, admits to smoking weed, in his house. Call out the National Guard!! Give me a break. This is only news because of who he is. Any other person, this doesn't even get a look.
pl
10:19 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
chris- i have no problem with a 20 year old smoking pot in his house no matter whos kid it is. but you dont have a problem with the fact that he drove after smoking? in a school zone (eventhough driving anywhere under the influence is a major problem)? with a 16 year old girl/ kid?
Paul Hurteau
4:13 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
PL,, How do you feel about someone who has a glass of wine and then drives.
Don't they pose the same risk???
Joe Loonam
6:09 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
What is the story about? Was it that 3 kids smoked pot? 3 kids are smoking pot right now in every town in America. I didnt read anywhere that Ms Donovan was smoking with them or that she supplied it....for heavens sake, is this the Patch or the Enquirer?
Big Ben
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Kirby,
When your 20 year old son takes my 16 year old daughter to your house during a school day to do drugs, I'll have him arrested for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. You can then make your apologies in Court. A lawyer may even think that you are guilty of failing to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment, and may be charged with maintaining an attractive hazard. If you are the owner of the property, I would consider suing you for allowing criminal activities to transpire. Would anybody believe that this was the first time this type activity took place? It could be just the tip of the iceberg. Does anybody actually get caught the first time they do something?
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
I'm with you Big Ben
Toni M.
6:09 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
"Police went to the home to make sure he didn't need treatment" - It had nothing to do with the Sheriff's Dept connection to Rutherford.
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Toni, I believe they do have an obligation to do just that. I think it is a law.
William Mays
6:09 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Talk about Republicans and their family values.
Carey Grant
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Yes, please do.
Zoë
11:12 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
He's really a good kid. How do you know that the pills were/ weren't prescribed to them? We have bigger problems in this world.
Kat
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Seriously??
Hackensack Marty
8:25 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
The bigger DONOVANGATE story is the cover up in the Bergen Record. Has anyone noticed that all the comments in the Bergen Record were taken down on orders of Alan Marcus who controls that newspaper ? Would any other family in Bergen County get such SPECIAL TREATMENT. The Arrogance and Power of the Democrats has been eclipsed by the bigger arrogance and hypocrisy of establishment Republicans. If Ms Donovan had spent more time at home rather than fighting and suing with every elected official from Saudino to Mike Dressler this may not have happened. I don't want to hear from this woman or her minions again about saving taxpayer dollars
Chris Antonelli
9:04 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Do you have actual proof that Mr. Marcus controls Northjersey News?
River Edger
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
" If Ms Donovan had spent more time at home rather than fighting and suing with every elected official from Saudino to Mike Dressler this may not have happened." -Martin Meehan
I haven't seen such a hateful, ignorant and sexist comment in a long time. Sickening.
fd
6:44 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
how is this ignorant, hateful or sexist? every parent should spend more time at home with their children
Cluch
10:13 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
I demand you step-down Donavan .
Hackensack Marty
10:30 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
pl Agosta knows what he is talking about. He and others in Hackensack have seen a copy of last years Marcus lawsuit against the Bergen Record where in a sworn affidavit he stated that he was successful in getting all comments about him deleted from the Bergen Record while in the same sworn statement he claimed that he was not a public figure. So now who is the idiot ?
Chris Antonelli
10:47 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Martin,
You don't need to be special to get comments removed if they're deemed inflammatory or borderline slanderous by the owner of the site. Do you really think The Record wants to get into a potential lawsuit over someone making comments? Especially if the comments are made by an anonymous person? Seriously now. Use your head.
Arya F. Jenkins
10:31 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Are we reliving the McCarthy era, or what? Everywhere I turn, people want to hang somebody for some infraction or other, and in any case, know what the best punishment is to dole out. Is this what happens when the Internet allows Joe and Jane Anybody to give an opinion?--people go on judgment frenzies?? What ever happened to supporting one another as a community, to allowing one another mistakes, to forgiveness?
To all the people who seem to know this poor kid who got arrested and has not only a law rap to deal with but the problems he cost his mother--How do you know he wasn't driving the girls to school so they wouldn't drive themselves, in their condition? Further, how do you know he was high, and not just motivated by a series of insecurities to smoke a little pot....From the days that I remember, you have to smoke a lot of weed to get high enough to be a hazard on the road....Please, lay off this kid and this family and Kathleen Donovan and stop with the playing God already...Let's hope the marijuana law passes soon. Some of you should try it. It might help you to chill!
pl
10:42 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
arya- while smoking pot is not an issue to me, there is no excuse and no explanation to drive after taking ANY substance that can impair your judgement AT ALL.
Ridgewood Mom 26
10:44 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
How is he a "poor kid"? He broke the law, and it sounds like it was actually a few laws. A law is a law, and I don't believe in "forgiveness" until he has been suitably punished. A car is a deadly weapon even when you're not high. If one can not be trusted to drive it responsibly, then he should not be given the priviledge at all. And yes, driving is a priviledge, not a right.
BellairBerdan
11:01 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Let's not ignore that he is an adult and he either supplied it to, or did it with minors as well.
Kat
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Poor kid?? He's an adult doing ILLEGAL drugs with underage girls and then getting behind the wheel to drive them BACK TO SCHOOL! I'm sorry ma'am, your advice to all of us to "chill" is misguided as you sound like perhaps you smoked a little too much
Toni M.
11:00 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
To Ridgewood Mom 26 that doesn't believe in forgiveness (glad you're not my mom), you might want to wait to see if he's actually found guilty. You may say a car is a deadly weapon, but words and a computer are much worse (don't you think?).
To the brainiac who thinks bashing the kid is ok cause he's a "public figure", he's not, just because his mother is a public figure, doesn't mean he is.
Andy Schmidt
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
>> You may say a car is a deadly weapon, but words and a computer are much worse <<
Worse than DEATH?
Have you given your argument any thought?
>> the kid is ok cause he's a "public figure", he's not, just because his mother is a public figure <<
Agreed!
He ONLY became a public figure when his arrest was reported - just like every other alleged criminal. People don't automatically become immune from public scrutity just BECAUSE the public role of their parent.
He is in the public eye for his ACTIONS not his RELATIONS.
Hackensack Marty
11:07 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Chris its more than obvious that you are a party to this action. If not I suggest that you go down to the courthouse and get a copy of the file and educate yourself and use your head on this Marcus individual who hosted Donovans swearing in ceremony at his home in 2010 . While doing that read all about the $ 300k contract he received a few months ago. If you want the truth follow the money
Chris Antonelli
11:28 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Ummm, not really, Martin. And now you're changing the story. We were talking about comments on a website and now you're firing off about hosting a party? Big deal. He hosted a party for Donovan. As for the contract, please post a link to the story.
Concerned Parent
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Joe L I'd like to see your reaction if a 20 year old was getting ur 16 year old daughter high while she was supposed to be in class...If it was my daughter the police would b the least of his worries...
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
[ :>) You can't say that "Concerned Parent" because now we know that you thought about it,that's premeditated.
Arya F. Jenkins
1:19 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Good points, all. Safety behind the wheel is uppermost, where lives are concerned, and this young man shouldn't have been driving, period. You're right, "poor" is an inappropriate choice of words. Finally, the main issue for me remains that it seems foolish to spend so much negative energy blaming others, when it really doesn't matter what we think, but what the authorities make of this, and other local matters, and, in the spirit of this, maybe Americans in general need to revisit their hearts and strike up a more positive attitude in general--about everything. Points made. Have a nice weekend everyone.
Paul Hurteau
3:51 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
SO by your logic, if a person has ONE beer that's it, they are intoxicated and should not drive??
Do you know how many hits (puffs) they took?
If ANYTHING the Xanax is what might have caused the attention to be drawn to the girls.
I have NEVER heard of someone having to go to the hospital for "TREATMENT" for Marijuana.
The number one killer of kids today is illegal use of LEGAL drugs. They are POISON and have to be administered in non-lethal doses.
MARIJUANA HAS NO LETHAL DOSE!!!
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Actually Paul if you drank a beer right now and drove to the police station you would fail the breathalyzer. It would take your body 1 hour to neutralize the alcohol in one beer,shot or mixed drink.
The Most Interesting Man in the World
6:00 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
What I am reading here is that the police entered a private residence and arrested someone who may have smoked pot hours before. This makes no sense to me.
BellairBerdan
9:43 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Does it make sense when the police learned that the visibly intoxicated underage teen girls that were taken to the hospital were with this person in his house earlier doing those drugs?
Tommy P
9:43 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
That's why it will get pleaded down to parking summons (or an equivalent). What a waste of tax payer's money.
The Most Interesting Man in the World
5:28 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Bellair, all I am saying is if I accused you of smoking pot, would you be OK with the police going to your residence, searching it and arresting you for what they find there? Seems like this kind of thing never happens unless your parent is a politician trying to rein in the cost of law enforcement. Same thing in Fair Lawn with ex-mayor's kid, smoking pot in a private residence, police enter and make arrests for smoking pot. When do you read about such things happening? So what I am saying there is more than meets the eye here because no one ever gets arrested for smoking pot in private. Also, like Thomas says, it is a waste of taxpayer's money.
BellairBerdan
6:12 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
There is more than meets the eye because you want to ignore that a 20 yr old man did it with 16 yr old girls that should have been in school. It was most certainly the duty of the police to investigate once those children said where they were. If you were the girls parents wouldn't you expect the police to investigate? When the police arrive and they smell the marijuana they have to do something. If they didn't and something happened to the 20 yr old they would be in a lot of trouble for letting an illegal act go without action. This wasn't simply someone smoking alone in their residence. No matter what anyone thinks about legalization it will NEVER be legal for minors. If I bought alcohol for your underage children and they became so ill they had to go to the hospital, wouldn't you demand the police to give me a visit?
The Most Interesting Man in the World
4:11 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
In Florida, a 26 year old man shoots a 17 year old to death in broad daylight, they know the shooter and they see the victim dead and it takes months to even get an arrest. In Rutherford, a 17 year old says she was smoking pot with a 20 year old hours ago, who knows if it is even true or how much of the story is true, however police go to his mother's home, enter private property, search the premises for drugs and paraphernalia and make an arrest. Besides the 2 cases of politician's kids, I have never heard of anyone arrested for smoking pot at home. I am not condoning any of the behavior of the young people involved, I am just saying there is more to the story that we don't know about. Also, according to the article, the girls ended up in the hospital over legal prescription drugs that they got on their own that the boy had nothing to do with, so why aren't they arresting those who supplied those drugs or the girls for abusing them? That is why this does not make sense.
Tom Troncone
9:54 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Gang, not sure this is the right thread for a debate on legalization.
Michael Agosta
6:00 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Wow. I guess Bergen County is a left-leaning, liberal region.
An adult smokes dope with underage girls and then drives while under the influence.
This is acceptable?
Tommy P
9:43 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Your almost absolutely right. Some things to consider, we don't know if Donovan even knew they had abused Xanax, or where they got it from. We don't know if he was actually stoned when he drove the car, after all, he was not stopped. If the police come to your house and take a breath test 20 minutes after you got home, being drunk then doesn't mean you were drunk when you drove 20 minutes earlier. A couple of beers could bring you over .08 real quick. He may have smoked after he got back home. Then there is the question is prohibition making the problem worse not better. Isn't it a bit hypocritical to support legalized tobacco and alcohol while limiting liberty on "dope"? I wonder if they search the home and seized any of the Donovan's cash.
Helping a minor ditch school, now I have a problem. Driving impaired, I have a problem. Becoming impaired, I think your idiot regardless of how you do it, but you should have the right to do stupid things to yourself, after all don't you own yourself?
maureen
6:00 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
I still like Kathleen Donovan, and I am a Democrat. She was cleaning up many abuses in our system to help the taxpayer. I am sure that irritated the powers that want the system as it stands. Sounds like someone had it out for her ?
A 20yr old is an ADULT , no one , not even a mother , has control over the actions of another adult ( even if it's her son).
Echelon
6:44 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
y'all are evidence of Reefer Madness...come on children.....at any given moment, someone within 500 feet of our vehicles, driving along with us, is intoxicated, stoned, enduring a medical emergency, gaseous, texting, applying makeup....pick your poison. Some commentary was spot on....."facts" people....facts. Considering the same ...who among us is so pure and innocent? For all the people who replied to the story, let me not catch you driving while picking your nose, that is a driving impairment, and if you're a notable community member....or relative....I will tar and feather you in the town square....oh yes, count me in as righteous.
Michael Agosta
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Echelon
You must understand that politics is all about perception. Period.
Echelon
6:12 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Perception is the key to finalizing thought processes, Michael Agosta. Law is definition of majorative rule. Opinion, however, is freedom of speech. Think for a moment....read the piece again...is it serving the public?....is it newsworthy?...will it prevent injury/death in the future?....let us hope so.., but ultimately, it comes down to exposure. If we all rationalize our experiences, and attempt to balance that which we strive toward, would we be politically correct?...would we be majorative rule? Does this piece educate us? Enlighten us?...We perceive what we want to believe, not what is.
Toni M.
3:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
To Andy, yes, I gave my comments thought, unfortunately I can't say the same for you. So here's the response, do you honestly think that three kids with Xanax and smoking pot would have made the front page for 2 days if the kid's mother wasn't the County Executive? Let me give you a clue to the answer. No!!
As far as your crazy conclusion that smoking pot and driving made the auto a "deadly weapon", are you serious? So all the people who smoke pot for medicinal purposes are putting the rest of us in jeopardy? Talk about crying wolf . . . get real. A person who drinks too much coffee or red bull is more likely to be a bigger danger on the road.
Mildred Bayes
4:11 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
The "majorative rule" here is that I love and enjoy reading gossip or "dirt" about others. It defines my life and makes me rather smug knowing people are stupid, greedy, and not so decent as I am. I love blowing out the candle of others because it makes my candle shine brighter.
There are several legal, moral, and human issues in the article; however, not to many commentators have contributed anything worthwhile reading or worthy of further discussion or comment. Sometimes life is very, very shallow; and this is a prime example of that observation.
Chris Hansen
4:11 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Ummm. There may be a decent story here.
NJP
6:51 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Taking the emotion and politics out of this story, based on NJ State Criminal Law (2C:24-4, Endangering the welfare of children), a "Child" or minor means any person under 16 years of age. That’s right folks, if your teenager is 16 or 17; they are not considered a child under the endangerment statute. The same holds true for dating relationships! Imagine when your kid brings home Mr. or Mrs. “Right” and that person is 35 or 40 years old??? Holy Cow!!! The “under the age of 18” stuff that we always hear about only applies to the teen if THEY break the law. Then the court handles their case in juvenile court and they are treated as minors...
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
And these girls broke the law,therefore they are minors and he goes to jail
NJP
6:51 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Based on NJ State Criminal Law (2C:35-5; Manufacturing, distributing or dispensing a Controlled Dangerous Substance-CDS). Marijuana in a quantity of less than one ounce all the way up to 25 pounds is considered a felony. On the smaller amounts I believe it depends on how the marijuana was packaged and if it was offered for sale. I think that simple possession/use is a misdemeanor as listed under 2C:35-10a(4) where possession is allowed up to 50 grams (about 1.75 ounces). Over that amount it’s a felony. Yes, 2C:35-5 contradicts 2C:35-10a(4) when it applies to the quantity of marijuana if it’s an ounce. Leave it to lawyers to confuse basic math?
Based on the NJSP UCR (Crime Report) 2010 there were 13,833 drug related arrests for the age group of 18 to 21 year olds in the entire state of NJ. Bergen County had 3,687 drug related arrests encompassing ALL age groups. (I couldn’t find it broken down by both county and age). I wonder how many articles were written about those people??? All of this information was gathered using NJ.GOV websites. Folks, what really happened here is that 3 teens decided to get high…nothing more, nothing less.
Andy Schmidt
3:44 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Nothing more?
>> After smoking with them, Donovan dropped the girls off at the high school, Ciser said. <<
The moment there is a car involved, I take it "personally" - because someone elses child or parent could just happen to be "in the way" of someone with impaired reflexes.
I suppose the other question is who "provided" (distributed/dispensed) the marijuana...
Tom Troncone
3:49 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Just to jump in on this... we actually do not have felonies in New Jersey. We have degrees of crimes. I'd be careful citing the 2C code on distribution here, though, because there are absolutely no allegations of distribution. The statutes also do not contradict, as the latter is for possession and the former is for distribution. Any amount of distribution comes with a presumption of incarceration. That's the difference.
Tommy P
6:12 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Its actually quite scary that in NJ, an appointed official can put you in jail for 6 months, while the federal Constitution says you have a right to a trial by a jury of your peers.
Cluch
3:44 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Perhaps you should take some your own advise.
Denise
7:00 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012
I'm reading some of these comments and some of them disturb me. Have we all forgotten what it was like to be a kid, teenager, young adult. Remember when all of you were 16? or have you forgotten? Remember when you were 20 or have you forgetten? We were all angels and never did a thing wrong, Right???.........
Andy Schmidt
8:42 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012
No angels.
But when I was a 20 year old adult and serving in the military, I knew better than to take 16 year old minors away from school to drug/booze them up.
Harry
8:18 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
No I don't forget. I remember when I was 16 and this girl I knew got drunk and was in and out of consciousness. Well she was mumbling my name when her father found her,he came after me and kicked my a@@. When my father heard this he called her father up and asked him if he wanted to kick some more of my a@@. Thank God some cops found out and saved me,they knew I was not near her that night. Talk about happy to see a cop!!