Crossroads Developer: Two Box Stores Are ‘Worst Case Scenario’
Board questions past, future environmental cleanup of site, which used to house Ford plant
A 600,000-sq.-ft. shopping development that includes a series of small shops, a movie theater and two box stores is the ‘worst case scenario,’ Crossroads developer Tony DiGiovanni testified Monday night at the continuation of a public hearing on the Crossroads Town Center. DiGiovanni told Mahwah’s planning board and about 60 residents in the crowd Monday night that the layout being presented at the hearing – with a 20-acre parcel of land on one side of Mahwah's Sheraton Crossroads Hotel containing smaller shops and a pedestrian corridor, and a 30-acre parcel on the other side of the hotel with two big box stores and one smaller storefront – might change.
“During this preliminary hearing we are seeking approval for the worst possible scenario, for the biggest stores we would be trying to fill,” DiGiovanni said. “After we start negotiating deals with tenants whose needs may be different than what we have presented here, we will make adjustments accordingly.”
During the current hearing, which began earlier this month, the Crossroads Developer Associates are seeking preliminary approval of the roadmap for the shopping center at the intersection of Route 17 and 287. According to Crossroads attorney Jim Jaworski, once that is granted, the developer will start negotiating agreements with stores that could fill the development, and return to the planning board later for a more-specific final approval. “This is all speculative in regard to tenancy [of the storefronts],” Jaworski said.
According to the board, so long as the final plan for the development maintains the main components of the preliminarily approved site plan, slight changes can be made. DiGiovanni’s comments about the box stores were made in response to board members asking whether or not he would consider changing the inclusion of the larger retail spots. “The public outcry against this seems to be mainly concerned with the two big stores,” board member Ward Donigian said.
According to Jaworski, the plan for the shopping center is in “complete accordance” with zoning ordinance 1684, which was approved by the township council last March to outline guidelines for the development. The ordinance was later repealed by the council, but not before the developer filed a site plan with the township. “The Gospel is [ordinance] 1684,” Jaworski said. Many changes to the plan suggested by board members were “not in line” with what the land use law dictates, Jaworski said.
“The plan for this center always looked like this,” DiGiovanni said. “I think the ordinance makes it clear that the layout anticipated is for two box stores.” He also said that splitting up the square footage of the box stores into smaller shops would not necessarily reduce traffic to the site. Planning board members said the “regional draw” of the bigger box stores is the main concern of many residents.
Monday night concluded the testimony of civil engineer Michael Junghans, who responded to questions about the design elements of complex. Future sessions of the public hearing were slated to include testimonies from an architect, traffic expert and planner. After a request from township engineer Mike Kelly Monday, the hearings will also include testimony on the current environmental status of the site, and the environmental impact of the development.
At a previous portion of the hearing, the developer indicated that if any contamination is found on the site, the Ford Motor Company would be responsible for cleaning it up. Ford operated a manufacturing plant on the site until 1980. “I think we should have testimony on the environmental history of the site, if any contamination was found, how it was cleaned, and what should be done going forward,” Kelly said Monday. “Also, might we get a representative from Ford here to confirm that Ford is the responsible party, and willing to clean up any contamination that has been found?” he asked.
The board decided it would consider public documents outlining the Department of Environmental Protection prescription for any necessary environmental cleanup at the site. The developer agreed to have an environmental expert testify at a later session of the hearing. However, DiGiovanni testified that “the DEP and Ford have completed cleanups of the site, and removed all soil that did not meet the standards for commercial development.”
Planning board members and members of the public expressed concern about the environmental status of the land. “The developer says Ford is responsible for the cleanup,” resident Phyllis Stewart said. “Ford doesn’t have the best track record. We need to check this out.”
Hank
7:54 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
very funny the "public out cry" went from "another Paramus" "another Palisade Center" to "two big stores" I love it.
Mrs ml
8:00 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
It's ridiculous, let the building begin. Has anyone been to Paramus lately?? We are a far cry from that.
JoeRobertson
10:32 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Um, no Hank. Were you at the meeting? The outcry continues to be "another Paramus." The people don't want this monstrosity. END IT NOW!
JP
11:06 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Yeah Joe, except that it isn't Paramus, and will never be. These Stop Mall people are long past their reality check. Long past.
Hank
12:18 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The stop the mall is long past reality check. I would say a few more meetings and you will be approaching "laughing stock" status.
JoeRobertson
8:33 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
You've already accomplished that for yourself on this forum.
Ralph
12:32 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
The outcry Joe? Lets get real. If you consider the 20 or so Stop the Mall fanatics out of 30,000 residents an outcry then you are mistaken. Lets get this straight, you keep saying that the majority of Mahwah does not want the development because the vote was 52% against/48% for. That was of the 26% voter turnout. Hardly a majority of the 30,000 residents. The reality is that it is going to be built. You dont have the power or the money to stop it and you are looking for a miracle to happen to stop it. The best thing for you to do is try to convince the planning board to get more from the developer at this point that might appease everyone, but to think that you are going to stop it is foolish.
JoeRobertson
8:31 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Ralph, perhaps you were not at that public hearing where 500 people showed up. The Stop The Mall committee, of which I am NOT a member, are REPRESENTATIVES of the people of Mahwah. A lot of people are not able to come out to all of the meetings. That does not mean they don't care, they do.
Lily
1:03 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Bring it on already... progression, jobs, commerce, a nice shot in the arm to this severely depressed economy! I want to go to the movies in the town I live and own in...Mahwah!
JoeRobertson
8:32 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Bring it on, traffic bottlenecks, crime, flooding. BTW, how many aliases are you going to create, "Lily?" (rolling eyes) You're not fooling anyone.
JP
2:21 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Her name's Lily Joe, not Sybil Dorsett.
Tim
2:05 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
I agree with Lily. I want to go to a nice movie theater in my own town. The theater in Ramsey is way past it's day. And to all the Stop The Mall people, if you don't want something built, then put up the money to buy the property from them. Don't ask the Town to pay for it, you put your money up, then see how it feels to own an expensive piece of dirt.
JoeRobertson
8:33 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Of course you "agree with Lily"... you ARE Lily under another alias.
JP
2:18 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Even if the Stop Mall group were successful, there would still be the issue of what to do with this privately owned land that's rapidly becoming the town's eyesore. Does the Stop Mall group propose to purchase it from the owners? You going to compensate them for their loss in revenue? You going to provide the additional jobs the mall would have in the area? Are you willing to subject every single citizen of this town to the possibility of their tax dollars going to award the owners their lawsuit damages if it's not built? Do you not THINK before you act? Or are you all that selfishly motivated that you conjure up wild scenarios about us becoming Paramus or having a massive increase in traffic clogging up all our local roads. What I hate about people (and this happens in every town) is the constant whining and fear mongering that takes place upon the initiation of every single new development project. We saw that with Pilot and others, and what we saw, after all was said and done, was no detrimental effects at all. And you know why, because the developers and the community worked together to make sure it was done right. It wasn't stopped, it was done right. That's going to be the same with this mall project with the added benefit that things will actually be better at the Sheraton site once the construction is completed. The Stop Mall messaging to just stop the project is beyond old & tired. Move on already and help make this mall a showcase we'll all love to visit!
Andy Schmidt
5:18 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Please do remember that it was zoned for office buildings all along - and the town was at peace with that. The developer bought lots knowing about their zoning and if they needed to wait another 10 years to eventually find interested parties, that was entirely their decision to make and risk to take.
This didn't become a contentious issue until a perfectly acceptable zoning was changed to retail by the then-council, even though that designation was contrary to the township's own master plan.
There was no good reason for the council to urgently designate a different, clearly "controversial" use - without having given full consideration to the sentiments of the township folks. It would have been appropriate to wait until November for the outcome of the referendum to gauge if there was "broad majority support" for a Mahwah Mall - or whether too many residents preferred to keep the current zoning.
Instead the council and then mayor completely botched this entire matter, by first approving the retail zone because they "knew better", inviting the first two law-suits, then taking back that change, inviting the third law suit, apparently admitting that they did NOT knew better. If the council was so "uncertain" about this matter, then NO action should have been taken instead of committing the township first and asking questions LATER.
JP
6:15 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
See that's where you're wrong Andy. The area was zoned for the mall for FIVE MONTHS before it was changed, not five days, five hours, or five minutes... five months! It wasn't a "mistake" where they said "oh, we didn't mean that. Just change it back". It was changed so that this town can finally move forward on having something done with that property. Even Lisa D voted in favor of it. I thought it was ultra hypocritical of her to change her vote, because it looked like she was only doing it for political favor with the Stop Mall group and to be contrary to her opponent, the mayor. Ultimately the zoning was changed back because I suspect the council realized that they needed to address the whining Stop Mall people somehow, so the fix was in to let the developers submit under the wire (and legally) and then the zoning was changed back to appease the mob, otherwise it WOULD have become part of the master plan if everything remained quiet. I don't agree with the way it was done. I personally would have told the group that the zoning was changed and to help shape the project because it's what's best (whether you realize it or not) for Mahwah, the state, and the nation to some degree.
JP
6:15 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
So I fail to see after all this time why you and some others just don't get that by now. You keep harping on the old, tired imaginary reasons and fears you don't want the mall, but I see none of the Stop Mall group expressing their thoughts on how we can make this project the best thing it can be for Mahwah in a long time. They just don't want it, no compromise, and that sir is not going to happen. there is too much invested in this project (in terms of people's time, money and effort) to just drop it, "just because". Time to move on...
Ralph
6:39 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Andy, Here is the problem with waiting until November to find out what the "People" wanted. They would not have come out and voted anyway because the "People of Mahwah really dont care. Just look at the voter turnout for any election. The council voted at the time what they thought was best. Sam A, Harry Williams, John Roth and Roy Larson voted yes to changing the zoning the first time, John S, Lisa D voted no. Chandris was not on the council at that time. After 5 months there was a change of heart by a few of the yes votes due to pressure from a group of people who claimed they represented all of Mahwah. No reason was given by those who changed their vote except Harry Williams who said his wife told him to do so!!! The others just couldnt stand up for their convictions. Sam A was the only one who stayed true to his vote right or wrong. The council botched this BIG time and should be ashamed of themselves.
Andy Schmidt
3:41 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
JP - you are quoting me incorrectly? Why?
I never said anything about 5 days or weeks. I know how long it took for the council to complete their backflip - part of that has to do that votes have to be placed on agendas, published, etc. But if you feel that the amount of time is relevant, then my 5 years, 10 years, 15 years(?) beat your 5 months, don't you think? <G>
Look, we traded a situation were the residents were content and that did NOT cause concerns to a significant portion of the township, with a situation that has divided the township and is uncertain in its long term effects.
All that, so that an investor could reap in profits by changing the rules under which they invested into that land!
Yes, I agree with you that my major beef is with the entire process and lack of consistency. I don't have a crystal ball to know which predictions about the mall will come true. I do have concerns in 2012 that I didn't have in 2010 when it was still zones as office space - so, naturally I am unhappy with the council having opened that can of worms when it would have been perfectly fine to let the developer sit on their investment until (not "if") a suitable party came along at a future time who would have used the space as it has been intended in all these years and for which I had NEVER heard any residents complaints.
JP
12:19 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
I didn't quote you at all Andy, what you stated was that "Instead the council and then mayor completely botched this entire matter" well get this straight Andy... they didn't botch it at all. They knew what they were voting for when the zoning was changed because they WANTED it to change, it wasn't some mistake that they needed to take back immediately after the change was put in place. You notice don't you that the change back was made AFTER the developer legally submitted their plans. You think that was by accident, or was it changed to give the Stop Mall group lip service?
JoeRobertson
8:34 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
JP... psst.... office space. That's how it was originally zoned.
Mary Churchill
3:43 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
I voted for the mall. Do you think your opinion is more valuable than mine? Let them build the Mall. If you don't like it sell your house and move. The majority of voters stayed home because even they think its absurd. Otherwise I think they would have made an effort to go vote no.
Andy Schmidt
3:58 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Mary - I'm not sure that I trust your ability in mind reading any more than I would trust MINE:
"The majority of voters stayed home because even they think its absurd."
Really? All we know is what THOSE peope wanted who actually DID go to the polls.
Those who didn't go to the poll didn't go for reasons neither you nor I know and it's outright dishonest for you to pretend otherwise.
(One could just as easily claim that the people who stayed home had seen plenty of vocal opposition and had read about the large number of signatories of the petition that they felt they didn't need to add their own vote against the mall, because that was going to be the outcome already. You would object to THAT interpretation - because it's just as much guesswork as what you are trying to pass as "fact")
That's what's wrong with this entire discussion/discourse. People lack facts (because no one actually CAN look into the future - but instead of stating what they don't know (it's prefectly fine to be concerned when facts are lacking, why not admit it) - they, like you, make up their own truths as they see fit - and we end up arguing people's fantasies.
I fully understand the hopes of the supporters of the mall - as I do understand the concerns of the opposition. The only thing that IS certain is that much is UNCERTAIN.
JoeRobertson
8:36 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Why should someone "sell their house and move" when their house was there first? And.. who is going to buy a house when it's now flooding and full of traffic?
Mahwah Resident
9:32 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
I would like to see how all the "Mall People" feel after it is built and is a complete disaster. I think you all should head over to Paramus and stay there.
JP
12:11 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
A little presumptuous aren't you resident? You're like the GOP who's been wishing since 2008 that our economy fails. FAIL!
Hank
9:59 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Mahwah resident the planning board is dealing with a 600,000 sq ft mall. It seems you do not want to be confused with the facts. When you post about Paramus I laugh at loud.Your group is becoming the town joke. It's over Johnny..
Andy Schmidt
3:47 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
The comparison with Paramus Park is not laughable. A while ago I had taken maps (identical sale) of the Paramus Mall, IKEA (and even Ramsey + Interstate Square) - and put them side-by-side the Crossroads:
http://www.schmidt.as/Crossroads%20Comparison.jpg
It helped me put it in perspective for me (IKEA and the Paramus Park mall had been referenced a few times by the developer).
JP
12:34 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
You're a smart guy Andy, right? If you take the layout of the new mall and eliminate all the parking spaces and the parking garage, the result is less then 50% of the acreage there. BTW, those 4 pictures you have there are not all the same scale making your comparison skewed.
Andy Schmidt
2:22 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
>> those 4 pictures you have there are not all the same scale making your comparison skewed.<<
JP - Rather than arbitarily making false allegations just because the facts are inconvenient and don't fit your preconceived notions, it's very easy: go into Google Maps, pull up the locations, but look at the map legend, adjust the map scale to be one and the same (initially they will NOT be because Google Maps will maximize each map section to the size of the object shown) and then you WILL perfectly reproduce my results.
I was VERY careful in setting the scale for all 4 satellite photos to the EXACT same value - because I did this quite a while ago for MY OWN benefit, after both sides were citing various other shopping centers for comparison and I finally wanted to validate what was being claimed by both sides.
JP
10:41 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Andy, you would be correct in setting the map scale the same on all four pictures IF they were taken from the same height, since I doubt they were you would need to calculate the difference in the original scales to set google map scales DIFFERENT (not the same) to force them to be equally scaled photos. I would have to physically show you what I mean on the computer. I still contend what I said before, that if you eliminate all the parking at the Sheraton site, you don't have too much of a mall left, it's still mostly empty parking. 50% or more.
Andy Schmidt
11:00 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
JP - no need for trigonometry to factor in the altitude of the satellite!
I just uploaded a screen shot with two browser windows side by side (in this case Crossroads and Paramus Park) to demonstrate the concept. The bottom of each map has a feature called a "map scale" which is part of the "legend" on every map.
On that scale you can see that 110 pixels on the screen on BOTH maps equal 200 meters on the ground.
That was true for ALL the maps I placed side-by-side.
Sorry - but no matter how you try to disort it - the comparison of the Crossroad with Paramus Park, IKEA and the combined two Ramsey shopping centers are ACCURATE.
Again, you can decide that this is not relevant to your opinion about the mall - but you cannot accuse me of having fudged those maps. They are accessible publicly and reproducible by anyone. I had made them for MY benefit after both sides started comparing Crossroads with IKEA and the Paramus Park mall.
JP
12:01 am on Friday, March 2, 2012
I would have to show you what I mean, regardless, the square footage of this mall is miniscule compared with the tens of millions of square footage used for malls in Paramus. I'll reiterate my mantra for you that Mahwah will never become Paramus, and that anyone's comparison with Paramus is senseless.
JoeRobertson
12:51 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
I think it's really funny that there are a few aliases in this "pro mall" group on The Patch comments that belong to the same person. The writing style is exactly the same. It's so obvious. How desperate this one person is.
JP
12:38 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
And you've got blinders on Joe if you think there's only one person who wants the mall that badly. Do you honestly believe that the Patch moderators would not see duplicate IP addresses for posts if that were true?
JoeRobertson
8:39 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
JP, c'mon. IP addresses? Two words, "Proxy Server." But you knew that, didn't you. And yes, I totally see a pattern here with one person and multiple aliases.
Charlie
9:01 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Hank, then move to Paramus, and the mall will be closer to you, see how easy, problem solved. Why bring Paramus traffic to Mahwah, so you can fight traffic to get to the Mahwah Mall. As I said last night, the 4 councilmen and the want to be mayor should have been dragged outside when 400 plus Mahwah residents were outraged by even the thought of the mall. A little blood spilt goes a long way in my book. Quick justice makes the next person think twice. The mall would not even be a thought at this time if a couple of people ended up in the hospital.
Hank
9:16 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Ramsey has malls with similar sq footage. Why don't you say I don't want all that Ramsey traffic? Because there is none.
Andy Schmidt
9:57 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
I do see the potential of the traffic impact to be quite different when you combine the traffic from the 2 Ramsey shopping centers, which are located at opposite sides of Rt 17, which have 4 local access points, plus 2 direct highway accesses on opposite sides of Rt 17, plus access to two highway exits immediately north and south of each shopping center for northbound and southbound travellers -- and now you concentrate all that to a SINGLE access to the Crossroads Mall which is located on a SINGLE side of Rt 17, and at a section of Rt 17 that already suffers from bumper to bumper traffic at certain times of the day, and which is at the 5-way intersection of two Interstates (287 and 87) plus a State Highway (17).
None of these factors apply to the Ramsey shopping centers. So I do see sufficient differences in every aspect of your comparison to understand why some people are skeptical that the traffic could worsen substantially.
I simply don't believe that these concerns should be summarily dismissed by armchair amateurs like you and me.
Hank
12:13 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
so how does it apply to Paramus?
Andy Schmidt
12:27 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
>> how does it apply to Paramus? <<
Now you're getting your different claims mixed up.
Scroll back to the top of this thread, where you stated:
"Why don't you say I don't want all that Ramsey traffic? Because there is none.".
I had responded to your "Ramsey" argument.
Hank
7:06 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Andy I wrote too fast. The stop the mall group is set on comparing the Crossroads to Paramus because they get the out come they want eg crime, traffic, services etc. But when I mention Ramsey which is next door not 15 miles away I am shot down as if the 1 million plus sq ft of rt 17 frontage does not count.
Now I want to point out that over the years I have had the Macy's,Fortunoff,Wakefern,C/S grocers, BJ's and Costco accounts. Malls are built in a way that the traffic is off the road and into the mall. Palisades, Willowbrook, Roosevelt Field,Rockaway even GSP all make sure you get trapped in the mall and off the highway even if there is no parking. You have nothing to worry about mall traffic blocking the highway they have it figured out
Lily
9:40 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Oh Lord.... Blood spilling... Shooting..guns ...bullets.....people in hospitals?? What is this the wild west? Crazy! Over what? Something that is surely inevitable in some way shape or form...
Mercedes1
10:34 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Jim,
Your comments appear to me to be totally inappropriate and threatening. Let's keep these comments as they should be...no need for guns and shootings mentioned.
JoeRobertson
3:23 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Wow, how many aliases can this pro-mall person cook up? You're not fooling anyone.
Hank
5:38 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
joe you are losing it
JoeRobertson
8:41 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Uh, no. Not "losing it" just caught the "pro-mall" people.. um.. I mean PERSON red handed.
JP
12:29 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Jim once said... "How many times does it have to be said Mahwah does not want a mall. People; stop being such lazy sacks of crap and drive to Paramus if you need to go to a mall so bad. I say, the town council that voted for the mall on Mach 31st got off easy by just being pulled off the council. I feel they should of all been dragged outside and shot, yes shot with a real gun and a real bullet for going against 400 plus Mahwah residents . See how fast the new town council knows whom they work for. I have been quiet long enough, I voted no mall and the town agreed no mall, I don’t care if it was by just one vote more, Mahwah does not want a mall. The people that did not vote, well if you didn’t vote, keep your mouth shut and just deal with it, next time get off you butt and vote otherwise remember Mahwah does not want a mall. All you people wanting the mall, move to Paramus and leave Mahwah what it is. If you wanted a mall so bad, why the hell did you move to Mahwah.."
This is the type of people we have trying to bully our council into making one-sided decisions for the people of Mahwah. Thugs. Don't want the mall Jimmy, don't shop there. It's as simple as that. (you tea party?)
Andy Schmidt
2:49 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
>> This is the type of people we have trying to bully our council into making one-sided decisions <<
Huh? This thing was put up to a vote, and those who cared enough to be either for or against it, represented the will of Mahwah (with the usual majority choosing to leave the question up to everyone else).
This is not "bullying" of the council, it was democratic, official vote - following the official protocol on how to conduct a referendum in this town!
The council had the option to await the the outcome of the referendum so that they knew what their consitituents expected of them. That wasn't an unreasonable expectation!
After all, this was not usual township business, like the "garbage pickup" decision that can be reversed the next year without any lasting impact. This time around, they were committing the township to a certain course in perpetuity - and therefore I feel they should have not acted like monarchs but as representatives!
JP
10:24 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Andy, let me say this once again and maybe you'll get it this time... the vote was put up in the first place BECAUSE of bullying by the Stop Mall group against the council. What is so hard to understand about that?
Andy Schmidt
10:37 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
There is nothing to "get" - if what you are saying is made up. The truth is, that the township has a formal procedure that was followed (the gathering of a certain number of signatures) in order to place the referendum on the ballot.
That's not bullying - that is properly applying the township code. Just because YOU felt no need for the vote, doesn't mean a few thousand of your neighbors didn't have to right to pursue the referendum.
Sufficient residents agreed, provided their signature, the signatures were certified, the question was placed on the ballot - and the result of the vote showed that of those who had a definite opinion a clear majority is opposed to the zoning change.
You may not like the truth - and you may not agree with the need for the vote or the outcome of the vote - and that is your right. But you simply can't substitute reality with your own (although there is probably a diagnosis to match that).
JP
10:48 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Andy, we wouldn't have needed a referendum in the first place if it were not for you detractors. This was (up to that point) a normal town/business transaction and the zoning was changed for it to move forward. All the conflict occurred AFTER everything was already approved and set to go to planning by the council. I don't see any other projects in this town going to referendum, do you? This is no bigger then say the the data center on MacAuthor. How come we didn't have a referendum on that construction? What about that traffic new to Island Rd?
Andy Schmidt
11:06 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Because the office / corporate offices on MacArthur were built in the area they were designated all ALONG to be built. Everything was done according to plan.
Those who object to the mall disagree with a complete and drastic CHANGE to the plan just to accomodate a private transaction. Since it committed the township in perpetuity and was not just a minor technicality but will have "some" major effect on Mahwah (the only disagreement is, whether under the bottom line that major effect will end up being positive or negative for the residents), I have no problem that people lobbied for a referendum to get a broad concensus on the matter instead of leaving it to the council.
JP
11:41 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Well, I see absolutely no problem with the mall, so I'm glad things are proceeding, but the fact of the matter is this project has less to do with zoning (except for you) then it has to do with emotional fears about traffic, some bigotry, and discrimination and that's why it was contested by some people. Even Charlie brought up the "type of people" that would be shopping there and the "crime wave" that would ensue, again tonight. Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? It does nothing for your case.
Charlie
7:51 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
JP, how is Jim a thug? What did he say that was so wrong. Everything thing he said was true,
The town went against 400 Mahwah residents.
The town voted on the mall, and the Mahwah residents that did vote, voted no mall.
Why is this so hard for you to get. The thugs as you call them is the town council that went against the Mahwah redidents on March 31. The town is 100% wrong for not allowing Mahwah residents to vote in the first place. The town council knew what the outcome would be. Mahwah residents took it upon themselves to ensure Mahwah residents had a vote on the mall matter.
And stop with the bullying JP, I am so sick and tired of hearing about bullying, in the schools, their are always going to be bullies. These kids today have to grow up to be men, not wimps, bullys JP, give me a break.
JP
10:27 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Oh please Charlie don't you realize that you and the others are the ones bullying me and the other pro mall people here. We are sticking up for our view (the correct one I might add) and not taking Tea Party tactics from people who feel they need to interfere with the progress in this town.
JoeRobertson
8:44 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
JP, I think you mean "pro mall 'PERSON'" not people. But hey, what's a few aliases on a newspaper forum? It's kind of hard to make aliases appear at planning board meetings, isn't it? Where are all those "pro mall 'PEOPLE?'
JP
2:17 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Joe, stop trolling and be serious will you. If you think everyone pro-mall on here is one person, you seriously need help because in your anti-mall dreams you wish we were all one person. Does it bother you that there's actually a group of people that approve of the project? Does it bother you that the whole town ISN'T behind you? It does doesn't it?
JoeRobertson
2:11 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
JP, it's not that difficult to see patterns in writing. There are a number of aliases on this forum from the same "pro-mall" person.
Hank
10:33 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Charlie the referendum will go down in Mahwah history as the dumbest move ever made by a political group. You had the council,planning board, the whole freakin town fooled. You had them eating out of your hand! They had no idea how many people you actually represented. For a while you had hundreds of signs up,website, lawyer,media advertisements. You were feared, no one is going to speak out against you guys.Then...for some reason you guys started believing your own bs. You got so full of yourselves that you would put the mall down once and for all with a referendum. Once your numbers were counted the town official realized they were duped and perhaps made a fool of things were not looking too good for you guys. The wise 340 members of the 400 you mention figured out they better not show their face at the meetings anymore. It's over. You have no clout and I suspect members of the council etc will be pro mall just to get even with all the ruckus you caused. Please keep posting you are hilarious.
What do you get when 400 ill advised people push for a referendum?.....a nice mall with a Costco
Charlie
11:21 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012
There is no bullying going on JP, please. All I am saying is the town should of had a vote on the mall before deciding on March 31st. it should not of been up to Mahwah residents to allow the town to vote on a project such as this.
Hank, what I find hilarious is you can’t count because more Mahwah residents that voted, voted for no mall. So a mall is being built against what Mahwah residents wants and you are proud of this. Thank goodness for the people that took it upon themselves to ensure Mahwah residents had a voice in this matter, otherwise we never really would of known what Mahwah residents really felt about having a mall in Mahwah.
What I will find even more hilarious is when the patch starts posting about things happening at the mall, crime, cars being broken into, hang out for kids at the movie theater, accidents due to one entrance and one exit and who knows what will happen when bus loads of people start pouring in, nothing I am sure. That’s going to be some good reading. So lets all sit back and enjoy the show, because in the next few years it is going to get a whole lot funnier. Until then, there is no sense going back and forth, lets sit back and see what the mall brings to Mahwah.
What do you get when you put a mall in Mahwah? ….. higher taxes to pay for more policemen as the crime rate goes up in Mahwah.
JP
4:59 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012
The one regret I DO have about this mall Charlie... It's not enclosed. Going to be cold in the winter and cut down on customers.
Hank
7:47 am on Friday, March 2, 2012
If you did not push for that referendum there would be no mall.
Thanks again
Charlie
10:55 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012
JP, I remember when we were all talking about the guy who cut down trees in Mahwah and I had mentioned the movie “The Road” you had said you saw it and liked the movie. I don’t know weather or not you watched another movie on a very good documentary on the path humans are taking towards the planet. I saw it on the History channel yesterday, it is called “Earth 2100”. The Mahwah library has a copy if you are interested in watching it. I believe you will find it very interesting, I know I did.
JP
4:46 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Yes, I have that on my queue at Netflix. I might move it up to the top so it comes in faster. Thanks!
Gottardo DiGiacopo
9:58 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Andy Schmidt,
Cudos to you for your informed, concise and civil discussion of the historical and developing facts regarding Crossroads. i am always disappointed by how your opposers take your unbiased information as a personal assault. you are a model citizen when it comes to political civil discourse. and i must question the objectivity (and common sense) of anyone who shares this information in support of a pro-mall argument: "Now I want to point out that over the years I have had the Macy's, Fortunoff,Wakefern,C/S grocers, BJ's and Costco accounts. Malls are built in a way that the traffic is off the road and into the mall. Palisades, Willowbrook, Roosevelt Field,Rockaway even GSP all make sure you get trapped in the mall..."
Do you think he is secretly working against the mall?
Hank
10:15 am on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Oh wait a second Gottardo your the guy who does want the mall because our HS kids will take drugs and sell their bodies there.
Randy H
4:18 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
I saw Earth 2100, I really liked that film as well. It is a shame what we have done to the planet and continue to do, I just did a quick google search which was “humans are they good for the planet” this is the first link that came up http://gnelson.hubpages.com/hub/Are-Humans-Good-For-Planet-Earth below is article from the website, boy if this isn’t the truth.
Randy H
4:19 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Are Humans Good For Planet Earth
We were never asked to take over the planet, we just did it. I am not so sure that we are doing a good job.
For millions of years the planet got along just fine without our leadership. The trees produced oxygen, the oceans produced fish, and sure the planet got hit by a meteorite or two and the climate got hotter or cooler but species survived or not on their own abilities. It was a natural thing that determined a species success or failure. Then we humans took over.
Two things happened. First we decided that we were more important than any of the other species and second we increased the speed of change. The first point should be obvious. There is not much that we won’t eat if we are hungry or destroy if it is in our way. Our numbers are growing to the point that the planet is straining to feed us. We will genetically modify other species to suit our needs. Which brings us to the second point; we have increased the pace of change. Changes before the human species were slow and measured, tested by thousands of years and hundreds of circumstances. You can read about more change in a single issue of the New York Times today than happened in the entire year of 1725. We don’t have time to absorb all the new things or all the new ideas before they are replaced by newer ones.
Randy H
4:20 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Did you know that when the first settlers landed in America that a squirrel could climb a tree on the east coast and not touch the ground until the Mississippi river. Now there are roads and houses and farms and ranches, the forests are gone. They were in our way.
Now add technology to the mix, I am writing this on a computer and posting it on the internet all in the same day. It is like time is being compressed and no one is watching the clock.
We are not the only important species on this planet We will not survive without the others. As we continue to change things to our will, we better remember that this planet is our home. We don’t have another plant to move to when we use this one up. It took millions of years for oil to pool under the Gulf of Mexico. . It took up a few months to foul the water of the Gulf with that oil. A hundred years from now our food will still come from the soil we poison with pesticides. We poison our rivers and other water sources like they do not matter. We are using resources at an unsustainable rate and in the process doing irreparable damage to our home. We are destroying plant and animal species at a rate that far exceeds their creation. We may be the most intelligent species on this planet but we are also the most irresponsible.
Randy H
4:20 pm on Sunday, March 4, 2012
Any change affects the planet like ripples on a pond. We all have that one thing in common. We share this planet. The ripples of others affect us all. We need to consider how the change we make affects this planet we share. We need to treat this planet, Earth, like we don’t have another one to move to when we have used this one up. It is our home, our only home.
JP
1:33 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Randy, that's too big a scale for individuals to cope with. The Earth will take care of itself when it deals with humans, as it always has, with natural calamities. If you think humans rule this planet you are surely mistaken. Earth rules us, and you only need to be in the middle of one natural disaster to realize that. We are trivial when it comes to the power of this planet.
resident
7:53 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Mary you must be kidding with the comment about selling your house and move out. Might be easier to do if you don't live in West Mahwah. These comments turn my stomach.
Randy H
8:32 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Hello JP, I couldn’t agree with you more. Humans do not by any means control the planet, mother nature has shown mankind time and time again, it can take Humans years and years to build anything and mother nature will destroy it in seconds, you are 100% correct in your statement. I just found that article very true how humans act like we can destroy and destroy the earth and nothing would come of it. What I truly find very sad and disheartening is humans as they destroy what’s in our way for what we call progress has no regard for any other creature that may live in the forests we cut down, or kill from our poisons from what we pour in the rivers that end up in the oceans.
Randy H
8:33 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
One part of the article I found amusing and very true was ” There is not much that we won’t eat” how true is that, all you have to do is walk into a supermarket and how many different animals and fish there is to choose from. We have made the whole world our kitchen, if it walks, crawls, swims or fly’s we will kill it and eat it on massive scales. What I really love and think it so amusing is if another animal weather it is raised by us for food or is a wild animal that kills a human it is marked as a man-eater and must be destroyed. I have no idea why humans can’t get it through our thick skulls, we are made of flesh and bones and weights on average between 120 to 220 pounds of easy pray for animals. As I have always said, if you don’t want to get bit or killed by a shark, simply don’t swim in the ocean, last time I checked a shark has not been caught trying to eat a human on land.
Randy H
8:33 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
I mean we as humans have this idea that animals should know better then to kill and eat humans, I mean really how are we this stupid to even likes this, what is their a school in the mountains for bears and in the oceans for sharks informing their young you can kill and eat every thing but humans. I mean we can kill and eat as much as we like and that is ok, but the second what we are trying to kill and eat kills a human it is a whole different story, everyone gets upset, it is on the news, a man eating shark kills a man, what do you expect if you are swimming in the ocean, you just swam into the sharks kitchen. Humans are still part of the food chain, the only reason is our brain to build weapons to kill larger and much stronger animals then us, other wise we would all be living in constant fear and hoping that when a large predator comes into our camp site it takes some one else and not me to eat. If you look at it from a predators point of view, when they hunt they go after the sick, old and weak, well if you were a shark and were hungry would you try to catch a fast tuna and burn a lot of calories or with no effort at all open your mouth and swallow a human, we are slow in the water and very weak as well, no risk for the shark to get injured, and that is a plus plus for a predator as it did not burn a lot of calories to catch and eat us.
Randy H
8:34 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
If there is a God, how disappointed he must be at what humans have done to his creation, which is earth and how we treat all the other species, we share earth with. As I always tell my wife when a major catastrophe happens especially from nature or a wide spread disease or just not enough food and people say why God how could you let this happen to us, what did we do to deserve this, all you have to do is look around the world and see how we have changed the planet, treat each other and treat other animals and that should be answer enough why God turns his back on us and lets nature have it’s way with us.
I mean really JP, I don’t know if you have any pets or not, but if someone came into your home and tried to hurt you or your pet and you managed to get this person out of your home would you really care if you hurt this person in the process or if he had noting to eat, I know I would not, due to what he tried to do to me. So if you look at it from Gods point of view, why should he care about us especially how we treat each other and every thing else on his planet? We as humans have faith when we need it on a personal level, other wise it is business as usual.
Randy H
8:34 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Anyway I have gone on long enough about this, I read where you have not watched Earth 2100 as of yet, but I think you will enjoy it as your comment when saying “the Earth will take care of itself when it deals with humans, as it always has, with natural calamities” is true and shown in this film at all levels.
Enjoy the movie,
take care.
Randy H
8:38 am on Monday, March 5, 2012
Anyway getting back to Earth 2100, there is no doubt in my mind that we as humans will not change, it is on too large of a scale, it is a world problem, not just a US problem, and when the crap really hits the fan, it will be too late because we would of passed the point of no return, and that is truly sad as was stated in the article I found “We may be the most intelligent species on this planet but we are also the most irresponsible” how true is that.
Hank
9:00 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Back in the day 400 people would show up.
JP
2:18 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Mayor Bill says it's less then 60 now.
Hank
7:12 am on Friday, March 9, 2012
now its 58 due to the recent arrests
resident
7:51 am on Thursday, March 8, 2012
JP - When is the next election for Mayor and who is going to be running?