patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Is The Anti-Mall Movement Dead?

Leaders of the Committee To Stop Mahwah Mall talk their fight against the development so far, and what they hope the future holds

 

On March 31, 2011 three core members of the Committee to Stop Mahwah Mall say they thought their fight against a 600,000-square-foot shopping development in the township was over.

“When I saw that many people at the town council meeting fighting against the mall, I thought our fight would be over that night,” Joey Bourgholtzer, one of the founding members of the CSMM, told Patch. Mike Richards, another who helped organize the movement, agreed. “For me, I didn’t think it’d be going on this long, or it would be this hard.”

The Committee formed after the March 31 council meeting, when a 4-2 vote changed the zoning of the Crossroads property, surrounding the Sheraton Mahwah Hotel, to allow for retail development. The group expressed concerns about traffic, crime, and environmental impacts the construction of the ‘Crossroads Town Center’ might cause.

At its peak, the group gathered several hundred supporters at town meetings to question the prospect of the development, and got over 2,000 people to sign a petition asking for a referendum vote on the issue. Even though key members admit that active membership has “somewhat ebbed” in the anti-mall movement that has gone on for over a year in the township, “we still have a strong core,” Richards said. Generally at town meetings, the group will get 30 to 50 people attending. “But, if we had a call to arms and needed members to come out for something, I think we could get 150 people easy.”

Last May, the group sued the township in an attempt to invalidate the ordinance. In July, the CSMM circulated a petition asking for a non-binding referendum questioning whether or not township residents wanted the shopping center. The petition the group handed to the township had over 2,200 signatures on it, prompting the council to repeal the ordinances and put the question of the mall on the ballot.

Because the Crossroads Developer filed a site plan application one day before the ordinances were repealed, it proceeded through the township’s government. Officials at the time questioned whether or not the timing should be allowed under a new “Time of Decision” state law saying that developers are subject to zoning laws in effect at the time of submission of the site plan.

The Crossroads Developer filed a suit against the township in September, claiming the town council unlawfully rescinded the ordinances.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let Patch save you time. Get local news delivered straight to your inbox or smartphone with our free daily newsletter. Sign up here.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In November, a little over 52 percent of the over 5,600 residents who voted on the issue said they did not support the development. Since it was non-binding, the vote did not have an impact on the development’s proceedings.

In January of this year, the township’s planning board began public hearings on the development.

The CSMM has been attending the hearings, questioning the board, updating the residents on its mailing list with news about Crossroads, and has been awaiting a decision in its court case. A court date in June has been canceled, and lawyers say a new one will be set this week. Bergen County Superior Court Judge Alexander Carver has consolidated the cases both the CSMM and the developer filed against the township, so both pending decisions will be made in one day.

Though the CSMM initially filed three counts against the town, it has whittled that down to one – a trial brief CSMM lawyer Michael Kates filed on behalf of the anti-mall group claims former town council president and mayor John DaPuzzo, who voted to introduce the ordinances while on the council and approved them as mayor, did so with a conflict of interest. The brief explains:

“First, Council President DaPuzzo’s wife, Dawn DaPuzzo, was the salaried Director of Recreation in Mahwah and was to benefit by the creation of recreational facilities to be administered by her.  Second, Council President DaPuzzo is a founding Trustee and former “Corporate Development” Committee member of a charity, the Mahwah Schools Foundation, to which the developer contributed substantial sums over the course of several years, with the knowledge of Mr. DaPuzzo.”

“This is not anything personal against the DaPuzzos,” Kates told Patch. “We just feel that he should have recused himself, and that we have a very strong case.”

The lawyer said the group’s goal is to get the ordinances allowing for the mall declared invalid. “If the planning board approves the site application, this suit is the last hope [to stop the building of the mall],” Kates said.

According to Andrew Fede, the township attorney defending Mahwah in both suits, “we are defending the ordinance being valid. There is no conflict [of interest] in our view.”

Fede declined to comment on the township’s specific defense, saying that its trial briefs are not due until the beginning of June. “Basically, the judge will decide if there was a conflict or not.”

Jim Jaworski, the attorney working on behalf of the developer, said he will be “side by side to defend the action of the council” at the impending hearing, but not as a defendant. “The action is against the township, but we will be there as an interested party."

The CSMM members said they are optimistic about the outcome of the suit.

“We are realistic, and we’re not anti-development,” Richards said. “Our goal is still the lawsuit. We are hoping we win because we feel that the development should not have come about the way it did. And, if another development option is presented in the future, I would hope it would be up to a binding referendum vote, because it is just too big a decision that will affect the whole town to be made by such a small group of people.”

However, even if the group loses, representatives say they will continue to follow the development. “We want to at least make sure that there is responsible development there,” Richards said. “So, we would continue to go to planning board hearings, ask questions, and bring up our concerns. We think we are playing an important role.”

Group leader Susan Chin said the CSMM will also continue to post news about the development on its website. “One of the most important things we’ve been able to do with all of this is keep residents in town more aware,” she said. “We will keep doing that.”

Until the trial date, the group said it plans to keep fighting the development. “This is not over,” Bourgholtzer said. “There are a lot of unknowns here – the planning board approval of the site plan, the DEP’s clearing of the environmental situation at the site, the DOT’s approval of the traffic plan the developer is proposing, and the outcome of our lawsuit. I don’t think this is over, at all.”

She added, “No matter how this turns out, I think it’s a good thing we’ve done; we’ve made a lasting impression, and I am proud of that. I have absolutely no regrets.”

The members of the CSMM said they are still providing updates and collecting monetary donations at their website.

Related Topics: Committee To Stop Mahwah Mall and Mahwah Crossroads

Gottardo DiGiacopo

8:03 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The anti-mall movement (aka pro-mahwah movement) is not at all dead, but it does need to rest from time to time. Many citizens in town (most especially the three mentioned in this article) have volunteered much of their time and money to see that our town is developed appropriately and with the consideration all of its citizens deserve. all the CSMM volunteers have families, careers, homes, pets, illnesses, hobbies etc., just like anyone else. all of these life issues have often been sidelined by them to try and affect a possitive change for this town. it is unfortunate that any one of us should have to police the arrogant, opportunistic actions of our elected officials in such a consuming way... let's hope justice will prevail, then we can build something to be proud of.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Glenn Murphy

3:21 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I agree with YOU FOLKS that:NO MALL in Mahwah is DAMN GOOD THING! I think those that "Want the MALL" should MOVE BACK TO Paramus NJ! Otherwise Mahwah should be "Open Space Town"! NOT SHOPPING MALL TOWN!

ONLY Reason that they want to build that damn SHOPPING MALL! Is the Property Location: Near the State LINE(New York State) to get all those New YORKERS $$!

Comment_arrow

Roger Pachiderm

3:48 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I did not realize they were building a dam too. Perhaps that will help with flooding. I also am not from Paramus so if (hypothetically speaking) I would like the mall to be built where should I move? Since I can not move BACK to Paramus. Also if we are going to send people to live in a place because of their opinions could we also expand that. I would like to send all people with Potty Mouths to Lodi and those who YELL WHEN TYPING to charm school in Hoboken. Those who do both can be shipped to Pennsylvania.

Comment_arrow

JP

7:13 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

You know Gottardo, I'm sick of your attitude of disrespecting our elected officials and sounding like your making them out to be criminals and unconcerned about this town. They did everything legally within their job responsibilities. Just because you and others don't like the actions should not be a condemnation of those people. Like I've said before, they had every right to make the decisions they did without YOUR input.

Mahwah0968

3:45 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

how about we building something that we are proud to call the center or Mahwah. what we have now does not represent our town. a pizza place a liquor store and dilapidated post office. oh yeah and lets not forget it will provide jobs and revenue for the town! if you are worried about the riff raff don't worry we have an incredible police force that will not tolerate that.

Reply

melissa lewis

4:05 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I am sick of hearing how we will be Paramus. I lived there my whole life and you cannot compare Mahwahs one section of proposed mall to Paramus that has mile after mile of stores. Apples and oranges.

Reply

Sandy

4:47 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

A couple of years ago many were so concerned about Pilot expanding their truck stop too close to the high school. All of what they said "could" happen hasn't (that I'm aware of) and now their fight is against the Crossroads mall & all that "could" happen. I'm going to continue living in Mahwah & I'm all for the mall being built. Time to move on to something else

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gottardo DiGiacopo

6:23 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

what we have suggested "could happen" will happen. traffic, crime and pollution (noise, air, water) will absolutely occur. Mahwah will absolutely need several new full-time police officers. and if built persons opposed to this mall will continue to love their kids and laugh and take vacations at the ocean etc., but we will also be deeply saddened that our town chose to become the new Paramus. remember, Garden State Plaza was initially proposed as something quite comparable to Mahwah's coming mall (it tripled in size); once it was built, the cavalcade of retail development there was relentless! Crossroads has enough property to dwarf Garden State.

Comment_arrow

JP

7:05 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Gottardo, that is just simply pure fantasy on your part. That's your problem, you assume what has happened in Paramus is what will happen here. Why in the world do you have that feeling? Is Ramsey a Paramus now in your opinion? They have much more retail development then Mahwah has, even after this center is built.

Comment_arrow

Hank

7:10 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

so 30 to 50 people, plus 150 more people (if you make a lot of phone calls) will be "deeply saddened"

I can live with that.

Comment_arrow

Mahwah Resident

9:20 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Sandy, if you do your homework about Pilot "all of what they said hasn't happen is because "they" got it changed not to put in a hotel where drugs, prostitution etc would be. "They helped change Pilot for the better. If it wasn't for the Pilot Group there would be a hotel on site right near the high school.

Comment_arrow

Hank

9:38 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

mahwah resident you are so full of baloney
mahwah h.s. is surrounded by hotels
Comfort suites,Hampton suites,Homestead suites
all within walking distance
oh I get it if it has the word "suites" its a safe place

JP

7:02 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

And so we see that their whole argument is based on this statement "I would hope it would be up to a binding referendum vote, because it is just too big a decision that will affect the whole town to be made by such a small group of people.” which basically is a false narrative. It will NOT effect the whole town in a negative way as they imply. That is pure conjecture on their part and can't be backed up with facts. It didn't happen with Pilot. It didn't happen with Home Depot, and it won't happen with this site either. Past projects are the proof of that.

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

7:20 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Hustle up a few more Pilots and Homey Dees, multiply that by 10,and add a huge multiplex cinema and you'll have something to make a comparison with JP... Opposers seem to have "no facts" but somehow you have "proof" that a mall at that particular bottle-neck of several highways and neighborhoods will have no ill effects on anyone. it's hard for me to take you seriously JP, not that i'm questioning your remarkable omnisciency.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank

8:03 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

If that's all you got, then yes, the stop the mall movement is indeed dead.

Comment_arrow

JP

9:50 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

No Gottardo it's we who have trouble taking you seriously when in one post you say our lives will go on fat and happy as usual after the center is built, and in another, you say we are going down the tubes when it becomes mall centric like Paramus. Which scenario is it?

Our "facts" are the fact that you don't have any facts to base your wild assumptions on. Previous projects went through the exact same whining about the exact same things and it's annoying because these projects are merely slowed down and made more costly by people (who do not have a valid, legitimate reason, only their own personal agendas) opposing these personal property projects. Be honest, your problems with this is merely political, you and CSMM (as revealed above in the story) have absolutely nothing against a mall, do you? You both just feel taken advantage of (falsely IMO), right?

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

2:22 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

>> Our "facts" are the fact that you don't have any facts to base your wild assumptions on. <<

Good - so everyone agrees that the projectiions of future benefits, or of likely impacts, are just THAT - projections, not facts. You don't have any, JP, neither do the opponents.

Only difference - you give more weight to the projections of the benefits, others are more concerned about the potential impacts. As a result, people have a different outlook - that doesn't make either side incompetent, dishonest,... (try as you might)

Mahwah Resident

9:51 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Hank, I have a high school student. Do you??? So......you think a hotel at a truck stop is good? Really!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

10:10 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Resident, if you're talking about the truckers not having a place to sleep there, well maybe you'd understand that the truckers... are just staying in the Super 8 motel or other hotels in the area just a short walk down 17 or sleeping in their trucks. You make it sound like truckers are either all deviants or criminals. Then again, you're good at showing us your bigotry all the time.

Comment_arrow

Hank

10:20 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

when the hotel "suites" next to the truckstop is slow they discount the rooms to the truckers next door..........head for the hills!!!!

Comment_arrow

JP

10:29 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Resident ought to pay a visit to that Pilot site, it's really nice. Even Mayor Bill says that. People have irrational fears about many things in this town. It's a shame, I feel bad for them.

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

12:46 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

JP, the Pilot site turned nice AFTER residents fought the original plans, so that we ended up with the exit to Ridge Road closed off, a tall fence installed, truck parking spots reduced drastically, overnight quarters eliminated, entertainment center eliminated...

The Pilot site is the prime example why we can NOT leave it up to a few elected/appointed souls when major stakes are at risk.

JP

10:40 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

It's funny, in the beginning of all this I was sometimes accused of not having valid input on this project because they thought I lived over on the Franklin Lakes side of Mahwah when I, of course, don't (I live in Cragmere). Yet the leader of the Stop Mall group DOES live on the border of Franklin Lakes (as far from the Sheraton as you can be in Mahwah) and no one questions (what seems like) her overwhelming concern with this project. I want to know exactly what Susan Chin's personal agenda here is and why she pushed this so hard and spun this out of control. Why exactly did she butt into this? Time for some more searches.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

12:40 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

So you can NOT allege she's just about "not in MY backyard". She is pursuing what she feels is best for the township NOT her neighborhood...
The farther someone is removed the more credible!

Comment_arrow

JP

2:42 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Or the more questionable.

Comment_arrow

Gottardo DiGiacopo

2:03 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

this one is just f---ing hysterical!!! i think Sue Chin is 'on the record' as originally having been more for the mall than against it, but like 52% of Mahwah she ultimately decided it was a bad idea. Susan is the type of person that volunteers for what she believes in. yes, she is determined (that annoys some folks), but she is also quite darling. Sue laughs very easily, is quick witted and has one of the most organized efficient minds i've ever met. i'm personally very grateful for Susan Chin and consider her a good friend. Now, i don't know how many people will jump on your "time for more searches" suggestion JP, but my hunch is you'll have to go that one alone... who knows, maybe you'll discover that Sue Chin dropped the twin towers.

also: i don't remember anyone ever caring much where you live JP; delusion often accompanies paranoia.

JP

2:44 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I really hope that a Lowe's comes onboard with this project in one of the larger buildings. I love Home Depot, but Lowe's... so much nicer.

Reply

Sandy

9:00 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Overnight quarters and "entertainment" we're not eliminated in the least. "They" built a motel on the property adjacent to the truck stop. And I've yet to hear of all the projected problems that the group suggested would occur. Guess you raised your kids right and they're not interested in all the scare tactics your group talked about

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank

9:13 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

they did get Pilot to change the name from a truckstop to a "travel center" and the hotel to "suites"

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:23 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I realize it's hard to remember what happened 5 years ago - but Pilot submitted 3 plans over 4 years before an acceptable one finally was approve. Here an abbreviated history. (I'm not asking you to agree with my opinion -- but I very much favor the ultimate outcome over Pilot's original 2 plans that were turned down)

"Jan. 24, 2007: After 23 hearings, the Board of Adjustment rejects Pilot's bid to build a 5,700-square-foot convenience center with showers, a game room and 27 fueling pumps.

Sept. 12, 2007: Hearings begin on a new application before the Planning Board to build a convenience store without showers and some of the other truck stop amenities. It would include one less diesel fuel pump, no overnight parking, a fence cutting off access to Ridge Road and the original 45 tractor-trailer parking spots would be reduced to 10.

June 2008: Pilot submits another application to the Board of Adjustment, this time for a service station — rather than a truck stop or travel center. It now needs a variance to operate within 500 feet of a school.

Nov. 26, 2009: The Board of Adjustment approves Pilot's application, with conditions, including the closing the Ridge Road entrance, prohibiting the sale of adult magazines and eliminating overnight parking.

Pilot agreed to remove trucker-friendly amenities, such as showers, a truck washing station and a motel, and to reduce the number of truck parking spots from 80 to eight."

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:32 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

They did get Pilot to change it from:

- 80 parkings spots
- 5,700 sq ft center/motel
- showers
- game room
- truck washing station
- ... (those are just ones I remember)

to

- 8 parking spots
- and NONE of the other things.

I very much appreciate the time and efforts of those residents who achieved this ultimate outcome.

Comment_arrow

Hank

10:13 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

it did not work out for me because I had 2 spots rented at the property for about 25 years but.....you did not get rid of the Pilot
and I predict you will not get rid of the mall
if you guys want to stay on their case so that it's a good mall
I have no problem

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

10:18 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

"you did not get rid of the Pilot"

And where did I say I wanted to? I'm a customer!

Comment_arrow

JP

5:02 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Andy, the original intent of the stop Pilot group was just that, STOP PILOT. Since they ultimately couldn't get their way the normal course of action went into effect and that was modifications to meet the town planners requirements, but that was not the group's original intent. They meant to squash the project, so don't make it out like they should get credit for a job well done. It would have been done long before that without them, and just as safe and proper.

Comment_arrow

Mahwah Resident

12:25 pm on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Sorry Sandy I was not a member of the Pilot Group you are referring to. But I do think they changed it for the better. Thanks I did raise my kids right. I teach them not to bully like alot of the people do on the Mahwah Patch. Also I don't really understand your assumption of "scare tactics".??

wendyy

9:23 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Look. Mahwah residents have a point here. You have not done a good enough job is protecting the interests of the community. This is probably one of the best strategic locations for any large retail operation. You should look at the confidential marketing studies done by the developers to get an idea on just how valuable this location is. You have traffic coming in from the east, from the north, from the south through multiple major highways. People are going to make a lot of money here. Just don't give it away. Have some of this money go to a fund for helping our schools and recreation. Don't blow this. You have not done a good enough job selling this monster to the community and you cannot blame them for being upset.

Reply

Tom Murphy

10:35 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

The Pilot station we ended up with is a huge improvement over what was there. The previous business that occupied that place was a drug den (and a known place to buy heroin), last resort motel (that truckers would not use and resulted in numerous drug busts, domestic violence calls and OD's), an illegal gambling joint that was busted multiple times and also a place that stored illegal chemicals and hazardous materials indoors. If Pilot did not purchase that property the township would have been much worse off. The outcry helped modify the plans into something useful for 99.9% of residents and travelers on route 17 - A gas station and clean convenience store. Compromise can result in the best outcome.

Reply

Sandy

10:40 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I already pay an exorbant amount of taxes for 'our schools and recreation'. When will it ever be enough?

Reply

Kevin

11:25 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Andy Schmidt very good points about Pilot. This is a point that is lost on people like JP. Residents voiced concerns about how it was to be built and this resulted in a better project which is there today. Shame on JP and the others who do not see this. The one who really is not creditable here is JP hiding behind two letters. I do have to thank you for posting JP so all the residents see we have residents like yourself living here who think all is ok and do not think things through.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

5:05 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

It's not lost on me Kevin, it's just plain wrong to attempt to totally stop the project in the beginning when their motive for doing so is someone's total fantasy about the town going down the tube. It's not reality. We've seen this on every other project. This one is NO different.

Comment_arrow

JP

5:07 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

If they had a valid reason, such as they are taking my house down to build this (like what happened with 287), I could sympathize, but imaginary traffic, no way.

Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

5:27 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Only imaginary shoppers using imaginary cars would create imaginary traffic.
Unfortunately for your argument, the developer counts on real shoppers using real cars on real roads - which is real traffic (as testified by the developer's traffic expert).

Some people are worried what impact this additional real traffic might have - and what cost the township might incur down the road when these impacts will need to be addressed. Whether one shares that worry or not, there is nothing ill-motivated about that concern.

Comment_arrow

JP

9:12 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

And so they feel that their hunch about traffic being impossible and an overblown comment about an additional 20,000 cars everyday is a valid reason to just stop everything? It is called the "Committee to STOP the Mahwah Mall" you know Andy, not "Help Build the Mahwah Mall" as best as it can be. If they are onboard to make the mall as best as possible now, then disband the official CSMM group, take the website down, and drop their lawsuit.

Sandy

4:02 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Shame on those who don't agree with you? It's that my way or the highway attitude that turns people off to your opinions. Not very becoming

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

5:09 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

You mean me? The whole Stop Mall group is who uses Tea Party tactics to (try and) get their way.

Sandy

5:23 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

I was responding to Kevin

Reply

Hank

7:35 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Back to the original question.
Stop the mall died the day the referendum results came out.
Once people realized that 48% heard the same things as they did about the mall and still wanted it , I think a lot of people just gave up and moved on.
If you did not have that referendum, there would be no mall.

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

10:45 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

A hundred comments ago JP asked me some questions about my offensive language and my true agenda. i'll answer those loosely by saying:

1) i don't accuse anyone of criminal behavior... its immorality (unethical, egoic, opportunistic, uncriminal behaviors) that worries me more than the stuff that can be prosecuted.
2) i can easily continue to live my blessed life happily even if a mall does get built, any healthy mature person has the capacity to cope with conflict.

3) i am deeply opposed to a culture addicted to selling and purchasing an abundance of low quality, disposable products and shitty foods... and i am especially opposed when my towns insightful zoning is dramaticly changed to please a rapacious landowner.

Somehow this Mega-Mall conversation has become a heresay argument about the Pilot station. In attempt to stop the outrageous revision of the Pilot Stations true history, Andy Schmidt listed facts of how our townfolks' involvement dramaticly improved the outcome. JP and Hanks' response was as always devoid of facts. Jp's were his classicly manic rants while Hank still just wants to be liked. It's about the facts boys!!! Cue Music...

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

12:28 am on Friday, May 25, 2012

OK G, if you're serious about your feelings, stop all the Stop Mall banter, get Susan to disband the group, drop the lawsuit and get in line, come together with us and help SUPPORT this mall so that it can be as upscale as possible for this town within the boundaries of the financials of the developer and town. Put your "desire" for no cheap malls and fast food where your mouth is, get involved again (as you claim certain people did with Pilot) and help get this thing get built.

Comment_arrow

Hank

10:19 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

I'll give you a fact. If they don't build the mall I could care less. If they build the mall...it will drive you crazy.

JP

12:33 am on Friday, May 25, 2012

Funny how it seems that if CSMM can't actually stop the mall, that they now want to try and take credit for actually getting the mall built right. Typical.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gottardo DiGiacopo

6:21 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

JP, you harmless clown, where do you think we've been all these months???
Where have you been other than on patch?
Who is "us" in your phrase 'come together with us' ??? i can name all the people i've been aligned with JP and none of them would be angered or offended that i publicly shared their names as my personal allies... i don't have an atom of curiousity who you are, but i want you to give me the names of 'your people' that i would be (quote) 'joining'... you know JP, the names of those people you've been working closely with on this pro-mall project... or is that a secret too?

There is an ordinance out there that was scripted by the developers; it is called 1684 and it is a perilous piece of shit. i will continue to help in any way i can to get that garbage ordinance out of Mahwah's existence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

JP

1:02 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012

And so you see above the typical hatred of a typical anti-mall zealot who thinks he can do a better job then anyone else can running this town. Where do I think you've been all these months? Wasting my time!

Hank

6:40 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

psst Gottardo....you lost

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

7:21 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

yeah but at least i got half of everybody to hang with hank. you're eatin roast beef by yourself :O)

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

1:07 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012

You can all soak in your hatred for the other half of us Gottardo. Don't do it at the mall though.

Hank

7:47 pm on Friday, May 25, 2012

actually its a Costco portobello mushroom cap,topped with a costco roasted red pepper,smeared with some Costco Hannah Bruschetta, then a Costco chicken breast covered with a mixture of Costco balsamic vinegar and mayo (so it sticks to the breast). Then topped with Costco mootz -a-rella
, and on top of that some costco panko .....350 degrees....Costco heaven....then of course a 12 0z Sam Adams glass filled with Weyerbacher's Insanity. No roast beef tonight sorry

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

4:22 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Then a visit across the parking lot to Lowe's. Awesome!

Gottardo DiGiacopo

9:00 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Hate is inconsistent with my values JP, and of the fine caring people i've met in the CSMM... though i (we) do remain exasperated by 1684 and the way it came about.
Got those names by any chance??

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

4:17 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

They're not so caring, several of us have shown you throughout this whole controversy over the last year how they (you) want things their way or no way. They could care less what I (we) want. They are essentially thugs and tea party tactic individuals who oppose much of the construction in this town due to politics and bigotry. Do you think the supporters of this center don't care about this town? We want that underused, running down site to get on the tax rolls and have it CONTRIBUTE to the growth of this town and not have it stagnate any longer. You may not think this is caring for the town, but i assure you it is, and once you come to terms with this Gottardo, maybe you'll get how it's better for the town overall to have it then not having it. As to names, I can't possibly name the over two thousand people who voted and the thousands of others who didn't vote who are FOR this center being built.

JP

4:18 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

You don't see us suing the town to force this center to BE built , do you Gottardo? That's the difference between you and I... demand... screw your demands.

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

10:46 pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012

1) so angry JP ?!?!
2) we also want that ugly land developed but consistent with our town's Master Plan
3) i'd settle for 3 names of persons you are in concert with (way down from 2,000)
4) any names/dates/examples/facts of 'thuggish opposition and bigotry'
5) any examples of the "several of you who have shown us to be thugs" (with names and data from both sides please)
6) we are suing for justice only (you should research this. people can't just sue for the sake of suing; there has to be some arguable impropriety)
7) i speak with conviction (even smugness) but i make no demands
8) i suggest our similarities would be a lot quicker to describe than our differences
9) are you sure 'my way or the highway' sounds like us?
!0) why so angry? don't you expect some people to disagree with you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

3:23 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

Consistent with the Master Plan? May I remind you that the Master Plan zoning was changed (legally) to allow the new center. It's already consistent with the plan when the details were submitted. You are suing for justice? You're not suing for justice, don't be cute, that's a real joke. You're suing because you can't stand to be shut up and shutdown, and shown to be losers, and you think a lawsuit is going to win your argument.

Hank

12:11 am on Monday, May 28, 2012

Mitt Romney would be for the mall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andy Schmidt

9:19 am on Monday, May 28, 2012

But only if renamed as the Kolob mall.

Gottardo DiGiacopo

9:00 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

JP, the master-plan has not been changed in decades. ordinance 1684 was done in spite of the Mahwah Master Plan and recently there was a planning board meeting on updating our town MP. They decided their vision would remain "Office with limited retail" (as it has always been without interruption). that is why the Patch had the impromptu vote on what we thought should go at the Crossroads... remember JP? it wasn't that long ago. you could research it but i'm sure you won't.
you're talkin ---- again my brother.

Reply

JP

12:12 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

You're just repeating yourself over again Gottardo. 1684 was an overlay zoning plan to the master plan and was quite valid for five months. The referendum vote was simply a vote to shut the Stop Mall complainers up. They gave them what they wanted knowing that it was meaningless. As a matter of fact, the vote showed that the developers had half the voters behind them. How encouraging. You shot yourselves in the foot with that referendum. BTW, let's say the zoning doesn't hold and the developer is restricted to office and hotel space only, what makes you imagine that your concerns are going to be any less of an impact then a mall would be? Whatever gets built there may have an impact. Are you going to fight an office building too? What's so unique about a mall with you? Let's all hear Gottardo's "personal" agenda with not building a mall...

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

9:07 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

JP, as is the case often, you are speaking incrypted-politico-smokescreen. You sidestep facts as good as any politician. i'll leave you a quote from the Mahwah Planning Board: "Ordinance 1684 is inconsistent with Mahwah's Master-Plan."

MY Agenda: traffic, pollution, false-economy, hyper-insulinemia, low wages, energy innefficiency, and of course corruption (unethical, not criminal), all suck! It's the same agenda as the majority of Mahwah's residents!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

9:07 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Yeah, now it is. Wasn't in May, June, July, or August of 2011. Strange.

Gottardo DiGiacopo

10:14 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

also: the developer/landowner has every right to develop his land in the way he knowingly purchased it... the way it was designed by our predecessors... the way we all bought into the ideal of Mahwah as our hometown: Bergen County's Parkland. when that occurs, i trust our elected council and planning board to govern it with comprehensive care. Had Mr. DaPuzzo stepped into Mayor Martel's shoes with some humility, and had he acted appropriately in the face of 450 mahwah residents begging for fairness and time, we wouldn't all be in this mess.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JP

8:58 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

We should all take that slur as YOUR (nasty) opinion and not anywhere close to fact. Mayor DaPuzzo was absolutely doing the right thing for Mahwah when he allowed that rezoning. If Mayor Bill doesn't step up for the mall in Mahwah, he will lose my vote in November to John. Your turn G...

Comment_arrow

JP

9:04 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

BTW Gottardo, maybe you should examine a map of Mahwah and Bergen County to see exactly where the borderline is for the "parklands". The Sheraton site isn't Bergen County Parkland. Never was, never will be. There was a huge Ford plant there. Remember that Gottardo? You were here then right. I was.

Hank

9:43 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

I agree with Gottardo
We do not need places where Mahwah HS students can "hang out" drink alcohol,take drugs and engage in promiscuity. We do not need a place where out of towners come to Mahwah in droves bringing crime and traffic.We do not need our emergency services stretched to the limit answering calls so far away from most of the residents. God forbid an ambulance is delayed because they are tending to non tax paying strangers! Does anyone realize that the majority of these out of towners are from crime ridden cities like Passaic and Paterson and fill their coolers with beer and booze and just looking for trouble? I say enough with "Bergens Parkland" close them now before it's too late!

Reply

Gottardo DiGiacopo

8:05 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

all the talking points have already been refreshed; your (JP & Hank) comments can be the last.
namaste

Reply

Leave a comment